Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30674451›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2019

Three week versus six week immobilisation for stable Weber B type ankle fractures: randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority clinical trial.

Tero Kortekangas, Heidi Haapasalo, Tapio Flinkkilä, Pasi Ohtonen, Simo Nortunen, Heikki-Jussi Laine, Teppo Ln Järvinen, Harri Pakarinen

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEquivalence TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01758835 (Evaluation of Different Non-operative Treatment Protocols of ER-stress Negative Weber-B Unimalleolar Ankle Fractures. A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01758835 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of Different Non-operative Treatment Protocols of ER-stress Negative Weber-B Unimalleolar Ankle Fractures. A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OuluRan2012 to 2017Enrolled247ConditionsLateral Malleolus FracturesArmsSplint 3 weeks, Cast 3 weeks, Cast 6 weeks
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Rehabilitation for ankle fractures in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Cast versus removable orthosis for the management of stable type B ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tero KortekangasDepartment of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, PO Box 21, FI 90029 OYS, Oulu, Finland tero.kortekangas@ppshp.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-3498-8048
Heidi HaapasaloDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Tapio FlinkkiläDepartment of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, PO Box 21, FI 90029 OYS, Oulu, Finland.
Pasi OhtonenMedical Research Centre (MRC) Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Simo NortunenDepartment of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, PO Box 21, FI 90029 OYS, Oulu, Finland.
Heikki-Jussi LaineDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Teppo Ln JärvinenFinnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics (FICEBO), Department of Orthopaedics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Harri PakarinenDepartment of Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Kajaanintie 50, PO Box 21, FI 90029 OYS, Oulu, Finland.
Oulu University Hospital · FITampere University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether treatment of isolated stable Weber B type ankle fractures with a cast or a simple orthotic device for three weeks produces non-inferior outcomes compared with conventional immobilisation in a cast for six weeks.

designRandomised, pragmatic, non-inferiority, clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment.

settingTwo major trauma centres in Finland, 22 December 2012 to 6 June 2016.

participants247 skeletally mature patients aged 16 years or older with an isolated Weber B type fibula fracture and congruent ankle mortise in static ankle radiographs.

interventionsParticipants were randomly allocated to conventional six week cast immobilisation (n=84) or three week treatment either in a cast (n=83) or in a simple orthosis (n=80).

main outcome measuresThe primary, non-inferiority, intention-to-treat outcome was the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score at 12 months (OMAS; range 0-100; higher scores indicate better outcomes and fewer symptoms). The predefined non-inferiority margin for the primary outcome was -8.8 points. Secondary outcomes were ankle function, pain, quality of life, ankle motion, and radiographic outcome. Follow-up assessments were performed at 6, 12, and 52 weeks.

results212 of 247 randomised participants (86%) completed the study. At 52 weeks, the mean OMAS was 87.6 (SD 18.3) in the six week cast group, 91.7 (SD 12.9) in the three week cast group, and 89.8 (SD 18.4) in the three week orthosis group. The between group difference at 52 weeks for the three week cast versus six week cast was 3.6 points (95% confidence interval -1.9 to 9.1, P=0.20), and for the three week orthosis versus six week cast was 1.7 points (-4.0 to 7.3, P=0.56). In both comparisons, the confidence intervals did not include the predefined inferiority margin of -8.8 points. The only statistically significant between group differences observed in the secondary outcomes and harms in the two primary comparisons were slight improvement in ankle plantar flexion and incidence of deep vein thrombosis, both in the three week orthosis group versus six week cast group.

conclusionImmobilisation for three weeks with a cast or orthosis was non-inferior to conventional cast immobilisation for six weeks in the treatment of an isolated stable Weber B type fracture.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01758835.

Indexed as

Casts, SurgicalOrthotic DevicesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnkle FracturesFemaleFibulaHumansImmobilizationIntention to Treat AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedSingle-Blind MethodTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID30674451
PMCPMC6342249
OpenAlexW2913412250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.