Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30674320›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Do health and social support and personal autonomy have an influence on the health-related quality of life of individuals with intellectual disability?

Montserrat Alonso-Sardón, Helena Iglesias-de-Sena, Luz Celia Fernández-Martín, José Antonio Mirón-Canelo

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Perspectives of Adults with Intellectual Disabilities on Quality of Life: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Montserrat Alonso-SardónArea of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, Avd de Alfonso X El Sabio s/n, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Salamanca, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
Helena Iglesias-de-SenaArea of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, Avd de Alfonso X El Sabio s/n, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Salamanca, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
Luz Celia Fernández-MartínDay Psychiatric Hospital of the University Clinic Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
José Antonio Mirón-CaneloArea of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Salamanca, Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, Avd de Alfonso X El Sabio s/n, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Salamanca, 37007, Salamanca, Spain. miroxx@usal.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the relation between perceived social support and personal autonomy of individuals with intellectual disabilities and Health-Related Quality of Life.

methodsA cross-sectional study with a multicentre sample was carried out including 162 institutionalized individuals with intellectual disability. The measurement tool was a structured questionnaire with sociodemographic variables, and three scales: Functional Independence Measure(FIM) scale, Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire, and SF-36 Health Survey, which were completed during an individual/family interview.

resultsThe perception of received social support is high on all 11 items of the Duke-UNC questionnaire, with an average of 3.45 for item-1 and 4.85 for item-11, which represents a total perceived support of an average 47.98 points (±SD7.30) (normal support). The Mental-Health component is rated worse than Physical-Health (67.41 vs. 71.74). The average rates for the different dimensions range from 57.34 points for Social-Functioning (the lowest rating) to 79.61 points for Bodily-Pain (highest rating). A multiple linear regression analysis reveals that the dimensions of Physical-Functioning (p < 0.001), Role-Physical (p = 0.016) and Bodily-Pain (p = 0.022), which are elements of the Physical-Health component, are independent predictive variables with the Degree of Autonomy (FIM) as a dependent variable. Social-Support (Duke-UNC) as a dependent variable is determined by the dimensions of Vitality (p = 0.014), Role-Emotional (p = 0.001) and Mental-Health (p < 0.001), which are part of the Mental-Health component and act as independent predictive variables.

conclusionsIndividuals with intellectual disability and a higher degree of personal autonomy determined by institutional and family support report better Health and Quality of Life.

Indexed as

Personal AutonomySocial SupportAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEmotionsFemaleHealth SurveysHumansIntellectual DisabilityMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPainPerceptionQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth-related quality of lifeIndividuals with intellectual disabilityPerceived social supportPersonal autonomy

Identifiers

PMID30674320
PMCPMC6345008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.