Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30674297›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Spanish validation endorsement of SDM-Q-9, a new approach.

Geovanny Efraín Alvarado-Villa, Jorge Daniel Moncayo-Rizzo, Jorge Andrés Gallardo-Rumbea

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05534412 (A Practice-Based Intervention To Improve Care for a Diverse Population Of Women With Urinary Incontinence), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05534412 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Practice-Based Intervention To Improve Care for a Diverse Population Of Women With Urinary Incontinence

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San DiegoRan2022 to 2027Enrolled1,600ConditionsUrinary IncontinenceArmsAcademic Detailing, Electronic Clinical Decision Support, APP Co-management, Electronic Referral
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Validity and reliability of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in a national survey in Hungary.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Geovanny Efraín Alvarado-VillaUniversidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador. galvarado@uees.edu.ec.
Jorge Daniel Moncayo-RizzoUniversidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9231-4503
Jorge Andrés Gallardo-RumbeaUniversidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo, Samborondón, Ecuador.
Universidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Shared Decision Making (SDM) model allows the patient to be part of their own disease treatment and control. The translation to Spanish of a questionnaire that measures the patient perception of SDM will allow enlarging the range of its application. However, the essence of the questionnaire can be altered during its translation, which could curb the appreciation of the question and what the question originally asked for. The objective of this study is to evaluate the application of SDM-Q-9 in its psychometric properties, to a Spanish speaking population after its translation process.

methodThe questionnaire was given to 76 outpatients who attended a medical control at the hospital. The informed consent process was developed before the patient underwent the physician's evaluation, and the SDM-Q-9 was applied when the patient finished the medical evaluation. The reliability of the questionnaire was evaluated and its structural validity was verified by the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

resultsThe SDM-Q-9 presented reliability and validity according to the following indicators. The internal consistency, measured by Cronbach's alpha, was 0.839 for the whole scale. The EFA showed a bi-dimensional solution, but the CFA indicated that the model with best indices of fit was the one-dimensional solution, excluding the first item. The indices used where: CFI 0.953, RMSEA (IC) 0.076 (0.000-0.134) for model 2, and CFI 0.961, RMSEA 0.071 (0.000-0.132) for model 5 are better.

conclusionThe questionnaire adaptation to the Latin American Spanish language has displayed reliability and validity according to the Cronbach's alpha indicators.

Indexed as

Decision MakingSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsAdultAgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2EcuadorFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsConfirmatory factor analysisDiabetes mellitusDoctor-patient relationshipPsychometricsSDM-Q-9 questionnaireShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID30674297
PMCPMC6343252
OpenAlexW2947808873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.