Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30674271›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

Fine mapping chromatin contacts in capture Hi-C data.

Christiaan Q Eijsbouts, Oliver S Burren, Paul J Newcombe, Chris Wallace

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The 3D Genome: From Structure to Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christiaan Q EijsboutsDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK.
Oliver S BurrenDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK.
Paul J NewcombeMRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, University Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, UK.
Chris WallaceDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK. cew54@cam.ac.uk.
MRC Biostatistics Unit · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/4Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/9Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT107881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHi-C and capture Hi-C (CHi-C) are used to map physical contacts between chromatin regions in cell nuclei using high-throughput sequencing. Analysis typically proceeds considering the evidence for contacts between each possible pair of fragments independent from other pairs. This can produce long runs of fragments which appear to all make contact with the same baited fragment of interest.

resultsWe hypothesised that these long runs could result from a smaller subset of direct contacts and propose a new method, based on a Bayesian sparse variable selection approach, which attempts to fine map these direct contacts. Our model is conceptually novel, exploiting the spatial pattern of counts in CHi-C data. Although we use only the CHi-C count data in fitting the model, we show that the fragments prioritised display biological properties that would be expected of true contacts: for bait fragments corresponding to gene promoters, we identify contact fragments with active chromatin and contacts that correspond to edges found in previously defined enhancer-target networks; conversely, for intergenic bait fragments, we identify contact fragments corresponding to promoters for genes expressed in that cell type. We show that long runs of apparently co-contacting fragments can typically be explained using a subset of direct contacts consisting of <10% of the number in the full run, suggesting that greater resolution can be extracted from existing datasets.

conclusionsOur results appear largely complementary to those from a per-fragment analytical approach, suggesting that they provide an additional level of interpretation that may be used to increase resolution for mapping direct contacts in CHi-C experiments.

Indexed as

CD4-Positive T-LymphocytesChromatinHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMacrophagesModels, StatisticalPromoter Regions, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNAChromatinBayesian statisticsCapture Hi-CChromatin conformationVariable selection

Identifiers

PMID30674271
PMCPMC6343296
OpenAlexW2950449714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.