ArticleBMC genomics2019
Fine mapping chromatin contacts in capture Hi-C data.
Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence for enhancer activity in intron 1 of TNFRSF1A using CRISPR/Cas9 in human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived macrophages.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comprehensive epigenomic profiling reveals the extent of disease-specific chromatin states and informs target discovery in ankylosing spondylitis.Cell genomics · 2023Article
- Widespread allele-specific topological domains in the human genome are not confined to imprinted gene clusters.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Inferring causal genes at type 2 diabetes GWAS loci through chromosome interactions in islet cells.Wellcome open research · 2023Article
- Capture-C: a modular and flexible approach for high-resolution chromosome conformation capture.Nature protocols · 2022Review
- Fine mapping with epigenetic information and 3D structure.Seminars in immunopathology · 2022Review
- 3D genome organization links non-coding disease-associated variants to genes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- The 3D Genome: From Structure to Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Detecting chromosomal interactions in Capture Hi-C data with CHiCAGO and companion tools.Nature protocols · 2021Article
- High-resolution targeted 3C interrogation of cis-regulatory element organization at genome-wide scale.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Stress Conditions Modulate the Chromatin Interactions Network inFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Chromatin interactome mapping at 139 independent breast cancer risk signals.Genome biology · 2020Article
- Chicdiff: a computational pipeline for detecting differential chromosomal interactions in Capture Hi-C data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHi-C and capture Hi-C (CHi-C) are used to map physical contacts between chromatin regions in cell nuclei using high-throughput sequencing. Analysis typically proceeds considering the evidence for contacts between each possible pair of fragments independent from other pairs. This can produce long runs of fragments which appear to all make contact with the same baited fragment of interest.
resultsWe hypothesised that these long runs could result from a smaller subset of direct contacts and propose a new method, based on a Bayesian sparse variable selection approach, which attempts to fine map these direct contacts. Our model is conceptually novel, exploiting the spatial pattern of counts in CHi-C data. Although we use only the CHi-C count data in fitting the model, we show that the fragments prioritised display biological properties that would be expected of true contacts: for bait fragments corresponding to gene promoters, we identify contact fragments with active chromatin and contacts that correspond to edges found in previously defined enhancer-target networks; conversely, for intergenic bait fragments, we identify contact fragments corresponding to promoters for genes expressed in that cell type. We show that long runs of apparently co-contacting fragments can typically be explained using a subset of direct contacts consisting of <10% of the number in the full run, suggesting that greater resolution can be extracted from existing datasets.
conclusionsOur results appear largely complementary to those from a per-fragment analytical approach, suggesting that they provide an additional level of interpretation that may be used to increase resolution for mapping direct contacts in CHi-C experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.