Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30673978›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2019

Impact of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery protocol on immediate surgical outcome in elderly patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Lileswar Kaman, Karikal Chakarbathi, Ashish Gupta, Divya Dahiya, Kaptan Singh, Krishna Ramavath, Arunanshu Behera, Kamal Kajal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients: Safety, Efficacy, and Cost Evaluation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lileswar KamanDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India. kamanlil@yahoo.com.
Karikal ChakarbathiDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Ashish GuptaDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Divya DahiyaDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Kaptan SinghDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Krishna RamavathDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Arunanshu BeheraDepartment of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Kamal KajalDepartment of Anaesthesia, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The numbers of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy are increasing and considerable percentage is elderly patients. Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a major and complicated surgery. The morbidity and mortality following pancreaticoduodenectomy have significantly reduced in recent times; it still remains unclear in elderly patients. Applications of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery protocol have contributed for this better outcome. In this retrospective study, patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with Enhanced Recovery after Surgery protocol were included and divided into two groups (< 60 years vs ≥ 60 years). The "elderly patients" (≥ 60 years) were defined based on the WHO definition for Indian subcontinent. Outcomes were analyzed in terms of postoperative morbidity, mortality and length of hospital stay. Total 103 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy during the study period (January 2012-December 2017). The mean age was 56.6 ± 10.32 years. Fifty-six (54.37%) patients were aged < 60 years (young group) and 47 (45.63%) patients were aged ≥ 60 years (elderly group). There was no difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, co-morbidity, preoperative drainage and diagnosis. There was no significant difference in the morbidity and mortality (p > 0.05). Delayed gastric emptying was the most common complication which was 25.24% (21% vs 23.41%). Pancreatic fistula rate was 13.59% (8.9% vs 12.76%) and hemorrhage was 4.85% (5.4% vs 4.3%). Mortality was 4.85%. Postoperative hospital stay was comparable (14.7 days vs 15.3 days) (p = 0.164). Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a safe surgical procedure in elderly patients in comparison to young patients. Application of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery protocol can improve the outcome further.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryAgedAge FactorsBile Duct NeoplasmsDuodenal NeoplasmsFemaleGastroparesisHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic FistulaPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomyPancreatitis, ChronicElderly patientERAS protocolMorbidity and mortalityPancreaticoduodenectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.