Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30673849›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2019

Circulating angiogenic cell response to sprint interval and continuous exercise.

Louis O'Carroll, Bruce Wardrop, Ronan P Murphy, Mark D Ross, Michael Harrison

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Issues on Trainability.Frontiers in physiology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Louis O'CarrollDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland.
Bruce WardropDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland.
Ronan P MurphySchool of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Mark D RossSchool of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.
Michael HarrisonDepartment of Sport and Exercise Science, Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland. mharrison@wit.ie.
Waterford Institute of Technology · IEDublin City University · IEEdinburgh Napier University · GB

Funding

Institutes of Technology, Ireland Strand I programme 2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough commonly understood as immune cells, certain T lymphocyte and monocyte subsets have angiogenic potential, contributing to blood vessel growth and repair. These cells are highly exercise responsive and may contribute to the cardiovascular benefits seen with exercise. PURPOSE: To compare the effects of a single bout of continuous (CONTEX) and sprint interval exercise (SPRINT) on circulating angiogenic cells (CAC) in healthy recreationally active adults.

methodsTwelve participants (aged 29 ± 2 years, BMI 25.5 ± 0.9 kg m

resultsCirculating (cells µL

conclusionAcute exercise transiently increases circulating T

Indexed as

Cardiovascular Physiological PhenomenaAdultExerciseExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonocytesNeovascularization, PhysiologicOxygen ConsumptionReceptors, CXCR4CXCR4 protein, humanReceptors, CXCR4Angiogenic T cellsEndothelial progenitor cellsHigh intensity exerciseTie2 expressing monocytes

Identifiers

PMID30673849
OpenAlexW2912159229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.