SynthesisPloS one2019
Fecal microbiota transplantation for treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection: An updated randomized controlled trial meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 77 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile (Clostridium difficile).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Fecal microbiota transplantation for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Pooled it
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation and Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Pooled it
- A Meta-Analysis of Microbial Therapy Against Metabolic Syndrome: Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Pooled it
- Fecal microbiota transplantation in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.United European gastroenterology journal · 2019Pooled it
- Impact of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome-A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- Exploring the Role of Gut Microbiota in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutic Implications.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Towards a Standard Protocol for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Review
- Modulating the Gut Microbiome as a Therapeutic Approach in Multiple Sclerosis: Implications for Gut-Brain Interactions and Immune Pathways: A Narrative Review.Brain and behavior · 2026Review
- A review of engraftment assessments following fecal microbiota transplant.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- The exploitation of nutrient metals by bacteria for survival and infection in the gut.PLoS pathogens · 2025Review
- Sex differences in gut microbiota, hypertension, and cardiovascular risk.European journal of pharmacology · 2025Review
- Tungsten is utilized for lactate consumption and SCFA production by a dominant human gut microbeProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Effects of gastrointestinal symptoms on the efficacy of washed microbiota transplantation in patients with autism.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation in patients with acute uncomplicated diverticulitis: study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
- The Human Gut Microbiota: A Dynamic Biologic Factory.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2025Review
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Indications, Methods, and Challenges.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2024Review
- Clinical Guidelines for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Companion Animals.Advances in small animal care · 2024Article
- From Gut to Eye: Exploring the Role of Microbiome Imbalance in Ocular Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2024-12-13Author Unresponsive · Breach of Policy by Author · Concerns/Issues about Article · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Error in Methods · Error in Text · Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAlthough systematic evaluation has confirmed the efficacy of fresh fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for treatment of recurrent and/or refractory and/or relapse C. difficile infection (RCDI), it lacks the support of well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the latest guidelines do not optimize the management of FMT. In this paper, we focus on an in-depth study of fresh FMT and fecal infusion times to guide clinical practice.
methodsWe reviewed studies in PubMed, Medline, Embase, the Cochrane library and Cochrane Central written in English. The retrieval period was from the establishment of the databases to September 20th, 2018. The retrieval objects were published RCTs of RCDI treated by fresh FMT. The intervention group was fresh FMT group, while the control group included antibiotic therapy or placebo or frozen FMT or capsule. The primary and secondary outcomes were the clinical remission of diarrhea without relapse after 8-17 weeks and the occurrence of severe adverse events, respectively. Subgroup analysis analyzed the effect of single and multiple fecal infusions. Two authors independently completed the information extraction and assessed risk of bias and overall quality of the evidence.
results8 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, involving 537 patients (273 in the fresh FMT group and 264 in the control group). The recurrence rate of clinical diarrhea in the fresh FMT group was 11.0% (30/273), which was significantly lower than the control group (24.6%, 65/264; P < 0.05); the pooled relative risk (RR) was 0.38 (95%CI:0.16-0.87; I2 = 67%; P = 0.02) in the fresh FMT group, and the clinical heterogeneity was significant and random effects model was used; However, there was no significant difference neither for the effect of antibiotic treatment/frozen feces transplanted by enema (RR = 1.07; 95%CI: 0.64-1.80; I2 = 0%; P = 0.79) or capsule/frozen feces transplanted by colonoscopy (RR = 0.42; 95%CI: 0.05-3.94; I2 = 43%; P = 0.45) compared with fresh FMT. The subgroup analysis showed that FMT by multiple infusions could effectively and significantly (RR = 0.24; 95%CI:0.10-0.58; I2 = 0%; P = 0.001) improve the clinical diarrhea remission rate. Most mild to moderate adverse events caused by FMT were self-limited and could be quickly alleviated; no severe adverse events happened because of FMT.
conclusionsOverall, the use of fresh feces for bacterial transplantation was the best efficiency for RCDI compared to antibiotic therapy or placebo. The fecal transmission method by enema was not ideal, but capsules or frozen feces transported by colonoscopy could be an alternative treatment compared to fresh FMT. For patients with severe RCDI, multiple fecal transplants can effectively improve their diarrhea remission rate. The focus of future research should be on how to standardize the production of capsules or frozen feces to better guide the clinical management of RCDI patients by FMT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.