ArticlePloS one2019
The impact of human activities on Australian wildlife.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Human-Wildlife Coexistence Through the Lens of Value Pluralism Among Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (IPLCs).Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Detection of opportunistic bacterial pathogens with intrinsic amoxicillin- and cephalosporin-resistance in wild koala faecal microbiomes.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2026Article
- High Genetic Connectivity and Weak Structure Shape Australian White Ibis Metapopulation Dynamics Across an Urban Coastal Landscape.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Contrasting urban ecology of two hedgehog species in Central European contact zone.BMC zoology · 2026Article
- Bella and Charlie Are Not the Problem-It's Us: The Real Causes of Wildlife Rescue in NSW.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Ticks and Tick-Borne Microorganisms in Australian Wildlife: A Scoping One Health Evidence Synthesis of Reported Associations and Knowledge Gaps.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Detection of amoxicillin-resistant and multidrug-resistantMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2026Article
- A Retrospective Analysis of Wildlife Rehabilitation Trends in Lithuania over Two Decades.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Easy rescues, difficult decisions: Advancing the ethical dialogue in wildlife triage, treatment and rehabilitation.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2026Review
- From Safe to Stranded: Land Use and Climate Change Threaten Habitat of Iconic Australian Macropods.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Echocardiographic Examination of 16 Eastern Grey Kangaroos (Macropus giganteus) and One Red Kangaroo (Osphranter rufus).Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2025Article
- Prevalence and implications of sex reversal in free-living birds.Biology letters · 2025Article
- Assessing the Use of 3D-Model Prostheses in White Storks: A Promising Method in Rehabilitation of Injured Wildlife.Biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Interactions between reptiles and people: a perspective from wildlife rehabilitation records.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Common Causes for Veterinary Visits among Australian Wildlife.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Synergistic effects of climate and urbanisation on the diet of a globally near threatened subtropical falcon.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- The Levels of Cortisol and Selected Biochemical Parameters in Red Deer Harvested during Stalking Hunts.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Morbidity and Prognostic Factors Associated with Wild Hedgehogs Admitted to a Wildlife Rehabilitation Center in Catalonia (NE Spain) from 1995 to 2020.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Trends in Admissions and Outcomes at a British Wildlife Rehabilitation Centre over a Ten-Year Period (2012-2022).Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing human population size and the concomitant expansion of urbanisation significantly impact natural ecosystems and native fauna globally. Successful conservation management relies on precise information on the factors associated with wildlife population decline, which are challenging to acquire from natural populations. Wildlife Rehabilitation Centres (WRC) provide a rich source of this information. However, few researchers have conducted large-scale longitudinal studies, with most focussing on narrow taxonomic ranges, suggesting that WRC-associated data remains an underutilised resource, and may provide a fuller understanding of the anthropogenic threats facing native fauna. We analysed admissions and outcomes data from a WRC in Queensland, Australia Zoo Wildlife Hospital, to determine the major factors driving admissions and morbidity of native animals in a region experiencing rapid and prolonged urban expansion. We studied 31,626 admissions of 83 different species of native birds, reptiles, amphibians, marsupials and eutherian mammals from 2006 to 2017. While marsupial admissions were highest (41.3%), admissions increased over time for all species and exhibited seasonal variation (highest in Spring to Summer), consistent with known breeding seasons. Causes for admission typically associated with human influenced activities were dominant and exhibited the highest mortality rates. Car strikes were the most common reason for admission (34.7%), with dog attacks (9.2%), entanglements (7.2%), and cat attacks (5.3%) also high. Admissions of orphaned young and overt signs of disease were significant at 24.6% and 9.7%, respectively. Mortality rates were highest following dog attacks (72.7%) and car strikes (69.1%) and lowest in orphaned animals (22.1%). Our results show that WRC databases offer rich opportunities for wildlife monitoring and provide quantification of the negative impacts of human activities on ecosystem stability and wildlife health. The imminent need for urgent, proactive conservation management to ameliorate the negative impacts of human activities on wildlife is clearly evident from our results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.