Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30673637›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2019

A comparison of hyperelastic constitutive models applicable to shear wave elastography (SWE) data in tissue-mimicking materials.

D P Rosen, J Jiang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D P RosenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, United States of America.
J JiangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8812-6246

Funding

Virtual Breast Project: Improving Noninvasive Characterization of TumorsR15CA179409 · NCI · MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY · PI JIANG, JINGFENG · 2014 to 2014
$453k
Elastography-based Analytics for Benign and Malignant Breast DiseaseR15EB026197 · NIBIB · MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY · PI JIANG, JINGFENG · 2018 to 2018
$450k
NCI NIH HHS R15 CA179409NIBIB NIH HHS R15 EB026197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shear wave elastography (SWE) techniques have received substantial attention in recent years. Strong experimental data in SWE suggest that shear wave speed changes significantly due to the known acoustoelastic effect (AE). This presents both challenges and opportunities toward in vivo characterization of biological soft tissues. In this work, under the framework of continuum mechanics, we model a tissue-mimicking material as a homogeneous, isotropic, incompressible, hyperelastic material. Our primary objective is to quantitatively and qualitatively compare experimentally measured acoustoelastic data with model-predicted outcomes using multiple strain energy functions. Our analysis indicated that the classic Neo-Hookean and Mooney-Rivlin models are inadequate for modeling the AE in tissue-mimicking materials. However, a subclass of strain energy functions containing both high-order/exponential term(s) and second-order invariant dependence showed good agreement with experimental data. Based on data investigated, we also found that discrepancies may exist between parameters inversely estimated from uniaxial compression and SWE data. Overall, our findings may improve our understanding of clinical SWE results.

Indexed as

ElasticityModels, TheoreticalPhantoms, ImagingAcousticsElasticity Imaging TechniquesHumans

Identifiers

PMID30673637
PMCPMC6668622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.