Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30672666›Full record

ArticlePigment cell & melanoma research2019

Conjunctival melanoma copy number alterations and correlation with mutation status, tumor features, and clinical outcome.

Nihal Kenawy, Helen Kalirai, Joseph J Sacco, Sarah L Lake, Steffen Heegaard, Ann-Cathrine Larsen, Paul T Finger, Tatyana Milman, Kimberly Chin, Carlo Mosci and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pigment cell & melanoma research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ocular Melanoma: A Comprehensive Review with a Focus on Molecular Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. The Dual Role ofBiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Association study betweenFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Nihal KenawyLiverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7907-5344
Helen KaliraiLiverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Joseph J SaccoLiverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Sarah L LakeLiverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Steffen HeegaardEye Pathology Section, Department of Pathology and Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ann-Cathrine LarsenEye Pathology Section, Department of Pathology and Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Paul T FingerThe New York Eye Cancer Centre, New York.
Tatyana MilmanThe New York Eye Cancer Centre, New York.
Kimberly ChinThe New York Eye Cancer Centre, New York.
Carlo MosciOcular Oncology Service, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Francesco LanzaOcular Oncology Service, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Alexandre MoulinOphthalmic Pathology Laboratory and Department of Ophthalmology, Jules Gonin Eye Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Caroline A SchmittOphthalmology Department, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jean Pierre CaujolleOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France.
Célia MaschiOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France.
Marina MarinkovicOphthalmology Department, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Azzam F TaktakLiverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Heinrich HeimannLiverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Bertil E DamatoOxford Eye Hospital and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sarah E CouplandLiverpool Ocular Oncology Research Group, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relatively little is known about the genetic aberrations of conjunctival melanomas (CoM) and their correlation with clinical and histomorphological features as well as prognosis. The aim of this large collaborative multicenter study was to determine potential key biomarkers for metastatic risk and any druggable targets for high metastatic risk CoM. Using Affymetrix single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping arrays on 59 CoM, we detected frequent amplifications on chromosome (chr) 6p and deletions on 7q, and characterized mutation-specific copy number alterations. Deletions on chr 10q11.21-26.2, a region harboring the tumor suppressor genes, PDCD4, SUFU, NEURL1, PTEN, RASSF4, DMBT1, and C10orf90 and C10orf99, significantly correlated with metastasis (Fisher's exact, p ≤ 0.04), lymphatic invasion (Fisher's exact, p ≤ 0.02), increasing tumor thickness (Mann-Whitney, p ≤ 0.02), and BRAF mutation (Fisher's exact, p ≤ 0.05). This enhanced insight into CoM biology is a step toward identifying patients at risk of metastasis and potential therapeutic targets for systemic disease.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overConjunctival NeoplasmsDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKaryotypeMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm MetastasisRisk Factorsallele-specific copy numberBRAF/NRAS mutationconjunctival melanomacopy number alterationmetastasis

Identifiers

PMID30672666
PMCPMC6849808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.