Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30672168›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of radiology2019

Optimal Kiloelectron Volt for Noise-Optimized Virtual Monoenergetic Images of Dual-Energy Pediatric Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography: Preliminary Results.

Taek Min Kim, Young Hun Choi, Jung Eun Cheon, Woo Sun Kim, In One Kim, Ji Eun Park, Su Mi Shin, Seong Yong Pak, Bernhard Krauss

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dual-energy CT: minimal essentials for radiologists.Japanese journal of radiology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Dual-Energy CT Images: Pearls and Pitfalls.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Taek Min KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6915-8795
Young Hun ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1842-9062
Jung Eun CheonDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Woo Sun KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
In One KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Eun ParkDepartment of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Su Mi ShinDepartment of Radiology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Seong Yong PakSiemens Healthineers, Seoul, Korea.
Bernhard KraussSiemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare quantitative and qualitative image quality parameters in pediatric abdominopelvic dual-energy CT (DECT) using noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) and conventional VMI at different kiloelectron volt (keV) levels. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty-six consecutive abdominopelvic DECT scans were retrospectively included. Noise-optimized VMI and conventional VMI were reconstructed at seven energy levels, from 40 keV to 100 keV at 10 keV intervals. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the liver, pancreas, and aorta were objectively measured and compared. Image quality was evaluated subjectively regarding image noise, image blurring of solid organ, bowel image quality and severity of beam-hardening artifacts. Optimal monoenergetic levels in keV for both algorithms were determined based on overall image quality score.

resultsThe maximal CNR and SNR values for all investigated organs were observed at 40 keV in noise-optimized VMI (CNR and SNR of liver, pancreas, aorta in order [CNR; 20.93, 17.34, 46.75: SNR; 37.39, 33.80, 63.21]), at 60-70 keV and at 70 keV in conventional VMI (CNR; 8.12, 5.67, 15.97: SNR; 19.57, 16.66, 26.65). In qualitative image analysis, noise-optimized VMI and conventional VMI showed the best overall image quality scores at 60 keV and at 70 keV, respectively. Noise-optimized VMI at 60 keV showed superior CNRs, SNRs, and overall image quality scores compared to conventional VMI at 70 keV (

conclusionOptimal energy levels for noise-optimized VMI and conventional VMI were 60 keV and at 70 keV, respectively. Noise-optimized VMI shows superior CNRs, SNRs and subjective image quality over conventional VMI, at the optimal energy level.

Indexed as

AdolescentAlgorithmsAortaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantLiverMalePancreasRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiography, Dual-Energy Scanned ProjectionRetrospective StudiesSignal-To-Noise RatioTomography, X-Ray ComputedConventional VMIDual-energy pediatric abdominopelvic CTImage qualityNoise-optimized VMIVirtual monoenergetic image

Identifiers

PMID30672168
PMCPMC6342763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.