Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30672165›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of radiology2019

Prognostic Significance for Long-Term Outcomes Following Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Prostate Cancer: Evaluation with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.

Ran Kim, Chan Kyo Kim, Jung Jae Park, Jae Hun Kim, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Hyun Moo Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mri-based cancer lesion analysis with 3d printed patient specific prostate cutting guides.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ran KimDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0241-2071
Chan Kyo KimDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0482-1140
Jung Jae ParkDepartment of Radiology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.
Jae Hun KimDepartment of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seong Il SeoDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seong Soo JeonDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hyun Moo LeeDepartment of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo retrospectively determine whether the use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 (v2) helps predict long-term outcomes for prostate cancer (PCa) patients following radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 166 patients with localized PCa evaluated with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) at 3T before RP were enrolled. Three groups were created based on PI-RADS v2 score used to predict clinical outcomes: group A, ≥ 3; group B, ≥ 4; group C, 5. We calculated biochemical recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cox proportion hazards models were used to identify variables predictive of biochemical recurrence and disease progression.

resultsDuring a median follow-up of 9.1 years, biochemical recurrence occurred in 67 patients (40.4%) and disease progression occurred in 55 patients (33.1%). In all groups, 10-year RFS and 10-year PFS were significantly lower for PI-RADS scores ≥ 3, ≥ 4 and 5 than for score < 3, < 4 and < 5 (

conclusionPI-RADS v2 may be used to predict long-term outcomes following RP in PCa.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedData SystemsDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProportional Hazards ModelsProstateProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific AntigenOutcomePI-RADSPrognosisProstate cancerProstatectomy

Identifiers

PMID30672165
PMCPMC6342765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.