Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30672086›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019

A comparison of patients' and dietitians' perceptions of patient-centred care: A cross-sectional survey.

Ishtar Sladdin, Lauren Ball, Brigid M Gillespie, Wendy Chaboyer

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Exploring stakeholder experiences of dietetic service and care delivery: A systematic qualitative review.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. The therapeutic relationship between a client and dietitian: A systematic integrative review of empirical literature.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Perspectives and Experiences of Adult Patients With Obesity in Dietetic Primary Health Care: A Qualitative Study in the Netherlands.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Navigating Person-Centred Nutrition and Mealtime Care in Rehabilitation: A Conceptual Model.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A comparison of patients' and dietitians' perceptions of patient-centred care: A cross-sectional survey.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ishtar SladdinMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1544-0087
Lauren BallMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Brigid M GillespieMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Wendy ChaboyerMenzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this study was to compare patients' and dietitians' perceptions of patient-centred care (PCC) in dietetic practice.

methodsParticipants were as follows: (a) adult patients who had attended ≥1 individual dietetic consultation with an Accredited Practicing Dietitian (APD) working in primary care; and (b) APDs with experience working in primary care. A cross-sectional survey was undertaken using a patient- and dietitian-reported inventory to measure PCC in dietetic practice. The inventory comprised of five previously validated scales: The Communication Assessment Tool; the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire; the Patient-Doctor Depth of Relationship Scale; the Schmidt Perception of Nursing Care Scale-Seeing the Individual Patient sub-scale; and the Person-Centred Practice Inventory-Staff -Providing Holistic Care sub-scale. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse participant characteristics and to compute total scores for the five scales. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare median scores between patients and dietitians.

resultsOne-hundred and thirty-three patients and 180 dietitians completed the survey. Patients reported significantly higher scores compared to dietitians for "shared decision-making" (P = 0.004), but significantly lower scores for "providing holistic and individualized care" (P = 0.005), "knowing the patient/dietitian" (P = 0.001) and "caring patient-dietitian relationships" (P =0.009).

conclusionThis study highlighted potentially important differences between patients' and dietitians' perceptions of PCC and identified key aspects of dietetic care requiring practice improvements. Strategies are needed to bridge gaps between dietitians' and patients' perceptions and enhance PCC in dietetic practice. These findings suggest that dietitians should focus on individualizing nutrition care, gaining a holistic understanding of their patients and knowing/understanding each patient.

Indexed as

Nutrition TherapyPatient-Centered CareAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesDecision Making, SharedFemaleHolistic HealthHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritionistsPatientsProfessional-Patient RelationsSurveys and Questionnairescomparisoncross-sectional surveydietitianspatient-centred carepatientsperceptions

Identifiers

PMID30672086
PMCPMC6543139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.