Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30671755›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2019

The Effect of Formalin Preservation Time and Temperature on the Material Properties of Bovine Femoral Cortical Bone Tissue.

Guanjun Zhang, Shujing Wang, Songyang Xu, Fengjiao Guan, Zhonghao Bai, Haojie Mao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deep silicification-assisted long-term preservation of structural and genomic information across biospecies: From micro to macro.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Methodology, selection, and integration of fracture healing assessments in mice.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guanjun ZhangState Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China.
Shujing WangState Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China.
Songyang XuState Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China.
Fengjiao GuanScience and Technology on Integrated Logistics Support Laboratory, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, 410073, China.
Zhonghao BaiState Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China.
Haojie MaoDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering, Western University, London, ON, N6A 5B9, Canada. hmao8@uwo.ca.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 11402296National Natural Science Foundation of China 51205118State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body, Hunan University 51475002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Literature has reported controversial findings on whether formalin affected bone properties, or not, especially when different preservation time durations and temperatures were involved. Hence, accurately and systematically quantifying the effect of formalin on the mechanical properties of bone using a large dataset is crucial for assessing biomechanical responses based on fixed specimens. A total of 154 longitudinal and 149 transverse cuboid-shaped (12 mm × 2 mm × 0.5 mm) specimens from the midsection of 12 bovine femora from six bovines were prepared and assigned to ten groups, including fresh-frozen, formalin-preserved at 25 °C for 4 weeks and 8 weeks, and formalin-preserved at 4 °C for 4 weeks and 8 weeks. All specimens underwent quasi-static three-point bending tests with a loading rate of 0.02 mm/s. The Young's modulus, yield stress, yield strain, tangent modulus, effective plastic strain, ultimate stress, and toughness were calculated by optimizing the material parameters to make the force-displacement curve of the finite element prediction consistent with the experimental curve, combined with specimen-specific finite element models. Preservation time and temperature both had significant effects on the Young's modulus, yield stress, effective plastic strain, yield strain and ultimate stress of cortical bone (p < 0.05). The Young's modulus, yield stress, and ultimate stress of longitudinal specimens decreased significantly with the increase of preservation time, and the yield strain increased significantly. As the preservation temperature increases, the Young's modulus of the transverse sample decreased significantly, and the yield strain increased significantly. The preservation time mainly affects the longitudinal specimens, while the preservation temperature mainly affects the transverse specimens. Formalin preservation of bovine femoral cortical bones at a lower temperature and less than 4 weeks is recommended for biomechanical testing.

Indexed as

Compressive StrengthStress, MechanicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCattleCortical BoneFemurFormaldehydeFormaldehydeCortical boneFinite element methodFormalin fixationMechanical propertiesOptimization

Identifiers

PMID30671755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.