Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30671634›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2019

Comparison of conservative versus surgical therapy for acute appendicitis with abscess in five German hospitals.

S Shekarriz, T Keck, P Kujath, J Shekarriz, T Strate, R Keller, E Schlöricke, J Nolde, A Ehlert, H Shekarriz

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Acute Appendicitis in Childhood and Adulthood.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Validation of Nonselective Conservative Treatment for Pediatric Acute Appendicitis.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

S ShekarrizUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Luebeck, Lubeck, Germany. shekarrizs@hotmail.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4738-9063
T KeckUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Luebeck, Lubeck, Germany.
P KujathUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Luebeck, Lubeck, Germany.
J ShekarrizHospital Reinbek, Reinbek, Germany.
T StrateHospital Reinbek, Reinbek, Germany.
R KellerSegeberger Kliniken, Bad Segeberg, Germany.
E SchlörickeWestkuestenklinikum Heide, Heide, Germany.
J NoldeUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Luebeck, Lubeck, Germany.
A EhlertSmartStep Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
H ShekarrizHelios Klinikum Schleswig, Schleswig, Germany.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEKrankenhaus Reinbek - Startseite · DEHelios Vogtland Klinikum Plauen · DEKlinikum Westfalen (Germany) · DESegeberger Kliniken · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of initially conservative therapy compared to immediate appendectomy for acute appendicitis with abscess in terms of medical and economic outcomes.

methodsOf all the patients treated for appendicitis from January 2009 to December 2017 in five German hospitals, 240 were included in the study. Fifty-three patients received conservative (CON) and 195 patients received surgical (SUR) therapy as initial treatment.

resultsLength of stay was similar (12.5 days in CON vs. 13.3 days in SUR, p = 0.530). Readmission rate was higher in the conservative group (54.7% vs. 6.2%, p < 0.001). The majority (53.7%) of the 41 operations in CON group were appendectomies (22 procedures), 1 (4.5%) of them was in the first hospital stay because of persisting symptoms, 21 (95.5%) after a recovery interval. Seven (33.3%) of the recovery appendectomies were performed due to persisting or recurrent symptoms and 14 (66.7%) due to the request of patient. Twenty-one patients (39.6%) in the CON group did not need surgery. The rates of complication-related operations per patient (0.04 versus 0.58, p < 0.001), conversions of surgical technique (1.9% vs. 34.9%, p = 0.0287), and extended resections (1.9% vs. 31.3%, p < 0.001) were higher in SUR group. Furthermore, morbidity, hospital costs, and loss in quality of life were significantly higher in the surgical group (17.0% vs. 66.2%, p < 0.001; € 5044 vs. € 8457, p < 0.001, and 4.3 days vs. 7.5 days, p < 0.001, CON vs. SUR).

conclusionInitially, conservative treatment for acute appendicitis with abscess is preferable to immediate surgical treatment in reduction of morbidity, hospital costs, and loss in quality of life.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentHospitalsAbscessAcute DiseaseAppendicitisEconomics, HospitalGermanyHumansLength of StayMorbidityPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeAcute appendicitisAppendectomyAppendicitis with abscessConservative therapyLength of stayQALYSurgical therapy

Identifiers

PMID30671634
OpenAlexW2911549867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.