Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30671588›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2020

Reoperations after surgery for acute subdural hematoma: reasons, risk factors, and effects.

Jan Chrastina, Čeněk Šilar, Tomáš Zeman, Michal Svoboda, Jan Krajsa, Barbora Musilová, Zdeněk Novák

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jan ChrastinaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, St. Anne's Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Pekařská 53, 656 91, Brno, Czech Republic. jan.chrastina@fnusa.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7529-773X
Čeněk ŠilarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, St. Anne's Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Pekařská 53, 656 91, Brno, Czech Republic.
Tomáš ZemanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, St. Anne's Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Pekařská 53, 656 91, Brno, Czech Republic.
Michal SvobodaInstitute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University Medical Faculty, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jan KrajsaFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Forensic Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Barbora MusilováDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, St. Anne's Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Pekařská 53, 656 91, Brno, Czech Republic.
Zdeněk NovákDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, St. Anne's Hospital Brno, Masaryk University, Pekařská 53, 656 91, Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze the reasons and patient-related and injury-related risk factors for reoperation after surgery for acute subdural hematoma (SDH) and the effects of reoperation on treatment outcome.

methodsAmong adult patients operated on for acute SDH between 2013 and 2017, patients reoperated within 14 days after the primary surgery were identified. In all patients, parameters were identified that related to the patient (age, anticoagulation, antiplatelet, and antiepileptic treatment, and alcohol intoxication), trauma (Glasgow Coma Score, SDH thickness, midline shift, midline shift /hematoma thickness rate, other surgical lesion, primary surgery-trephination, craniotomy, or decompressive craniotomy), and Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS). The reasons for reoperation and intervals between primary surgery and reoperation were studied.

resultsOf 86 investigated patients, 24 patients were reoperated (27.9%), with a median interval of 2 days between primary surgery and reoperation. No significant differences in patients and injury-related factors were found between reoperated and non-reoperated patients. The rate of primary craniectomies was higher in non-reoperated patients (P = 0.066). The main indications for reoperation were recurrent /significant residual SDH (10 patients), contralateral SDH (5 patients), and expansive intracerebral hematoma or contusion (5 patients). The final median GOS was 3 in non-reoperated and 1.5 in reoperated patients, with good outcomes in 41.2% of non-reoperated and 16.7% of reoperated patients.

conclusionsReoperation after acute SDH surgery is associated with a significantly worse prognosis. Recurrent /significant residual SDH and contralateral SDH are the most frequently found reasons for reoperation. None of the analyzed parameters were significant reoperation predictors.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAlcoholic IntoxicationAnticoagulantsAnticonvulsantsCraniocerebral TraumaCraniotomyDecompressive CraniectomyEpilepsyFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleGlasgow Outcome ScaleHematoma, Subdural, AcuteHumansAnticoagulantsAnticonvulsantsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsAcute subdural hematomaBrain injuryContralateral subdural hematomaDecompressive craniectomyReoperation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.