Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30671358›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2019

A review on chemical mechanism of microalgae flocculation

Arivalagan Pugazhendhi, Sutha Shobana, Peter Bakonyi, Nándor Nemestóthy, Ao Xia, Rajesh Banu J, Gopalakrishnan Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Removal ofPeerJ · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Enhancing starch accumulation/production inBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Preparation, Performances, and Mechanisms of Microbial Flocculants for Wastewater Treatment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  15. Effective Harvesting ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arivalagan PugazhendhiInnovative Green Product Synthesis and Renewable Environment Development Research Group, Faculty of Environment and Labour Safety, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
Sutha ShobanaDepartment of Chemistry and Research Centre, Aditanar College of Arts and Science, Virapandianpatnam, Tiruchendur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Peter BakonyiResearch Institute on Bioengineering, Membrane Technology and Energetics, University of Pannonia, Egyetem ut 10, 8200, Veszprém, Hungary.
Nándor NemestóthyResearch Institute on Bioengineering, Membrane Technology and Energetics, University of Pannonia, Egyetem ut 10, 8200, Veszprém, Hungary.
Ao XiaKey Laboratory of Low-grade Energy Utilization Technologies and Systems, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, China.
Rajesh Banu JDepartment of Civil Engineering, Regional Campus Anna University Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu, India.
Gopalakrishnan KumarInstitute of Chemistry, Bioscience and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, Box 8600 Forus, 4036, Stavanger, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Industrially, harvesting of the microalgal biomass is a techno-economic tailback, which essentially meant for the algal biomass industry. It is considered energy as well as cost-intensive in view of the fact that the dewatering process during harvesting. In this review chemical reactions involved in the flocculation of microalage biomass

Indexed as

Chemical reactionsFlocculationMicroalageNatural biopolymers

Identifiers

PMID30671358
PMCPMC6328355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.