ReviewGMS infectious diseases2017
Asymptomatic bacteriuria in recurrent UTI - to treat or not to treat.
Review in GMS infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enterococcal-host interactions in the gastrointestinal tract and beyond.FEMS microbes · 2024Review
- Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections and Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Adults.Current bladder dysfunction reports · 2022Review
- Urinary Tract Infections Caused byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Review
- Review
- Implications of Bacteriuria in Myelomeningocele Patients at Time of Urodynamic Testing.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Differentiating Asymptomatic Bacteriuria From Urinary Tract Infection in the Pediatric Neurogenic Bladder Population: NGAL As a Promising Biomarker.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Asymptomatic bacteriuria in recurrent UTI - to treat or not to treat.GMS infectious diseases · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU) is a common clinical condition that often leads to unnecessary antimicrobial use. The reduction of antibiotic overuse for ABU is consequently an important issue for antimicrobial stewardship to reduce the emergence of multidrug resistant strains. In the clinical setting we have an important issue that requires special attention: the role of ABU in women affected by recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs). In everyday clinical practice, young women affected by rUTI show after antibiotic treatment asymptomatic periods associated sometimes with or without bacteriuria. Although it is not recommended, the majority of women with ABU is treated with poor results and occasionally a selection of multidrug-resistant bacteria can be observed. Recent studies demonstrated that ABU should not be treated in young women affected by rUTI, because it may play even a protective role in preventing symptomatic episodes, particularly when Enterococcus faecalis has been isolated. Moreover, ABU treatment is associated with a higher occurrence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, indicating that ABU treatment in women with rUTIs is even potentially dangerous.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.