ReviewGMS infectious diseases2016
Genotypic resistance testing of HCV - is there a clinical need?
Review in GMS infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Persistent infections with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) pose a profound global public health burden. In the past 5 years treatment of chronic hepatitis C has dramatically changed. Novel direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) specifically inhibiting viral enzymes or factors that are essential for the viral replication cycle have been developed and licensed for hepatitis C therapy. These novel drugs target the viral NS3/4A protease, the NS5B RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase or the replication factor NS5A. Combinations of DAAs against these targets are highly efficacious achieving virus elimination in the majority of treated patients. In countries where affordable, this rapid clinical development virtually replaced earlier interferon (IFN)-α based therapy that had been in use as standard of care for the last 25 years. With the approval of DAAs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C the question emerged whether resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) might be of clinical relevance. Here, we discuss the available evidence for the possible benefit of resistance genotyping prior to therapy to optimize treatment of chronic hepatitis C.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.