Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30671200›Full record

ArticleThe Korean journal of pain2019

Acceptance versus catastrophizing in predicting quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain.

Gracia Mayuni Semeru, Magdalena S Halim

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Korean journal of pain, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06599645 (Impact of Combined Core Stability Training, Blood Flow Restriction, and Tai Chi on Muscle Physiology and Functional Characteristics Among Adults With Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06599645 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Combined Core Stability Training, Blood Flow Restriction, and Tai Chi on Muscle Physiology and Functional Characteristics Among Adults With Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiti Teknologi MaraRan2024 to 2025Enrolled52ConditionsLow Back PainArmsCST+BFR+Tai Chi+Education, CST+BFR+Education, Tai Chi +BFR+Education, CST+Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Validation of the Croatian Version of the Eight-Item Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Influence of frailty status on the health-related quality of life in older patients with chronic low back pain: a retrospective observational study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Health-related quality of life deviations from population norms in patients with lumbar radiculopathy: associations with pain, pain cognitions, and endogenous nociceptive modulation.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gracia Mayuni SemeruDepartment of Psychology, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Magdalena S HalimDepartment of Psychology, Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between pain catastrophizing, acceptance, and quality of life in relation to chronic low back pain in Jakarta, the capital city of Indonesia. We also analyze the effect of personality in catastrophizing and acceptance.

methodsA total of 52 chronic low back pain patients were enrolled as participants from 2 hospitals in Jakarta (43 females, 9 males, mean age 54.38 years). Participants completed a set of self-reported questionnaires: the NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI), Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-Revised (CPAQ-R), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and Pain Discomfort Module (PDM).

resultsThis study showed that acceptance increased the patient's quality of life by giving physical relief from pain. In contrast, pain catastrophizing decreased the quality of life, and increased the patients' tendency to get frustrated, irritated, and anxious about the pain. From a personality perspective, the trait neuroticism may lead to a higher level of pain catastrophizing.

conclusionsThis study showed that catastrophizing, compared with acceptance, had a greater impact on the patient's life by reducing its quality.

Indexed as

AnxietyCatastrophizationChronic painLow back painPersonality disordersQuality of lifeSelf reportSurvey and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30671200
PMCPMC6333577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.