Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30670909›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2019

Adverse events related to colonoscopy: Global trends and future challenges.

Su Young Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim, Hong Jun Park

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 141 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04979351 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Post Colonoscopy Abdominal Massage on Abdominal Pain, Distension, Discomfort and Patient Satisfaction: A Randomized Controlled Study Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorProf. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital OrganizationRan2020 to 2021Enrolled180ConditionsHealthyArmsAbdominal Massage
NCT06666556 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Bowel Preparation in Colonoscopy: Lactulose vs Polyethyleneglycol, Randomized Double-blind Comparative Clinical Trial, Multicenter Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Civil de GuadalajaraRan2024 to 2025Enrolled449ConditionsColorectal Cancer ScreeningArmsBowel preparation before colonoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Second-generation capsule endoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps: An updated systematic review and comparative meta-analysis of prospective studies.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Total Colonic Decompression Fails to Decrease Post- Colonoscopy Abdominal Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Colorectal cancer surgery without preoperative histology does not compromise surgical quality-A nationwide cohort study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Su Young KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju 26426, South Korea.
Hyun-Soo KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju 26426, South Korea. hyskim@yonsei.ac.kr.
Hong Jun ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju 26426, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colonoscopy is a widely used method for diagnosing and treating colonic disease. The number of colonoscopies is increasing worldwide, and concerns about associated adverse events are growing. Large-scale studies using big data for post-colonoscopy complications have been reported. A colon perforation is a severe complication with a relatively high mortality rate. The perforation rate, as reported in large studies (≥ 50,000 colonoscopies) published since 2000, ranges from 0.005-0.085%. The trend in the overall perforation rate in the past 15 years has not changed significantly. Bleeding is a more common adverse event than perforation. Recent large studies (≥ 50,000 colonoscopies) have reported post-colonoscopy bleeding occurring in 0.001-0.687% of cases. Most studies about adverse events related to colonoscopy were performed in the West, and relatively few studies have been conducted in the East. The incidence of post-colonoscopy complications increases in elderly patients or patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. It is important to use a unified definition and refined data to overcome the limitations of previous studies. In addition, a structured training program for endoscopists and a systematic national management program are needed to reduce post-colonoscopy complications. In this review, we discuss the current trends in colonoscopy related to adverse events, as well as the challenges to be addressed through future research.

Indexed as

Colonic DiseasesColonoscopyEducation, Medical, ContinuingGastrointestinal HemorrhageGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceIntestinal PerforationPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeAdverse eventsBleedingColonoscopyPerforationPost-colonoscopy

Identifiers

PMID30670909
PMCPMC6337013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.