ArticleScientific reports2019
Digital Biosensing by Foundry-Fabricated Graphene Sensors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Graphene Nanosensor for the Detection of Small Organic Compounds Using an Insect Olfactory Receptor.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Biomimetic Carbon-Based Nanomaterials: From Design Strategies to Next-Generation Biosensing and Theranostic Applications.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Review
- A portable and cost-effective system for electronic nucleic acid mass measurement.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Real-Time Monitoring in Biomanufacturing with Graphene Field-Effect Transistor Sensors: Detection of pH, Glucose, and Antibodies.GEN biotechnology · 2024Article
- Digitalization of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay with Graphene Field-Effect Transistors (G-ELISA) for Portable Ferritin Determination.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Graphene-based field-effect transistors for biosensing: where is the field heading to?Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024Review
- Carbon Nanomaterial Fluorescent Probes and Their Biological Applications.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- The Roadmap of 2D Materials and Devices Toward Chips.Nano-micro letters · 2024Review
- Applications of Graphene Field Effect Biosensors for Biological Sensing.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2024Review
- Ordered Mesoporous Electrodes for Sensing Applications.ACS omega · 2023Review
- PEDOT-Polyamine-Based Organic Electrochemical Transistors for Monitoring Protein Binding.Biosensors · 2023Article
- Graphene-Based Field-Effect Transistors in Biosensing and Neural Interfacing Applications: Recent Advances and Prospects.Analytical chemistry · 2023Review
- Carbon-Related Materials: Graphene and Carbon Nanotubes in Semiconductor Applications and Design.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Biofunctionalization of Graphene-Based FET Sensors through Heterobifunctional Nanoscaffolds: Technology Validation toward Rapid COVID-19 Diagnostics and Monitoring.Advanced materials interfaces · 2022Article
- Graphene-Based Biosensors for Molecular Chronic Inflammatory Disease Biomarker Detection.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Towards Perfect Absorption of Single Layer CVD Graphene in an Optical Resonant Cavity: Challenges and Experimental Achievements.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Fabrication and microfluidic analysis of graphene-based molecular communication receiver for Internet of Nano Things (IoNT).Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Discrimination of single-point mutations in unamplified genomic DNA via Cas9 immobilized on a graphene field-effect transistor.Nature biomedical engineering · 2021Article
- Article
- Advances in the development paradigm of biosample-based biosensors for early ultrasensitive detection of alzheimer's disease.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prevailing philosophy in biological testing has been to focus on simple tests with easy to interpret information such as ELISA or lateral flow assays. At the same time, there has been a decades long understanding in device physics and nanotechnology that electrical approaches have the potential to drastically improve the quality, speed, and cost of biological testing provided that computational resources are available to analyze the resulting complex data. This concept can be conceived of as "the internet of biology" in the same way miniaturized electronic sensors have enabled "the internet of things." It is well established in the nanotechnology literature that techniques such as field effect biosensing are capable of rapid and flexible biological testing. Until now, access to this new technology has been limited to academic researchers focused on bioelectronic devices and their collaborators. Here we show that this capability is retained in an industrially manufactured device, opening access to this technology generally. Access to this type of production opens the door for rapid deployment of nanoelectronic sensors outside the research space. The low power and resource usage of these biosensors enables biotech engineers to gain immediate control over precise biological and environmental data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.