Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30670662›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Triparental inheritance in

Gareth Bloomfield, Peggy Paschke, Marina Okamoto, Tim J Stevens, Hideko Urushihara

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. On the evolution of variation in sexual reproduction through the prism of eukaryotic microbes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. The molecular foundations of zygosis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gareth BloomfieldDivision of Cell Biology, Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QH, United Kingdom; garethb@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4269-8059
Peggy PaschkeDivision of Cell Biology, Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QH, United Kingdom.
Marina OkamotoFaculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, 305-8572 Ibaraki, Japan.
Tim J StevensDivision of Cell Biology, Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QH, United Kingdom.
Hideko UrushiharaFaculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, 305-8572 Ibaraki, Japan.
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105115237Medical Research Council MC_U105178783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex promotes the recombination and reassortment of genetic material and is prevalent across eukaryotes, although our knowledge of the molecular details of sexual inheritance is scant in several major lineages. In social amoebae, sex involves a promiscuous mixing of cytoplasm before zygotes consume the majority of cells, but for technical reasons, sexual progeny have been difficult to obtain and study. We report here genome-wide characterization of meiotic progeny in

Indexed as

meiosismitochondriarecombinationsocial amoebaesyngamy

Identifiers

PMID30670662
PMCPMC6369745
OpenAlexW2952545637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.