ArticleBMJ open2019
Cross-sectional research conducted in the Netherlands to identify relationships among the actual level of patient-centred care, the care gap (ideal vs actual care delivery) and satisfaction with care.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Continuity of Cancer Care: Female Participants' Report of Healthcare Experiences After Conclusion of Primary Treatment.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to identify relationships among the actual level of patient-centred care (PCC), the care gap (ideal level of PCC vs actual care delivery) and satisfaction with care.
designThis study was a cross-sectional survey.
settingThis study was conducted at two locations of a Dutch hospital (Nieuwegein and Leidsche Rijn Utrecht).
participantsPatients visiting the outpatient clinics for heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cancer in March-May 2017 were asked to fill in a questionnaire. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis with COPD, heart failure or cancer and clinic visitation for a regular appointment. A total of 186 patients filled in the questionnaire. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes evaluated were the actual level of PCC, the care gap and satisfaction with care.
resultsAbout half (45%) of the respondents were female, 38% had low educational levels and 31% were single. Respondents' mean age was 67.83 ± 10.02 (range, 16-94) years. Patients' experiences with actual care delivery and their conceptualisation of the ideal type of care differed significantly, representing care gaps, in all PCC dimensions. After controlling for background characteristics, patients' experiences with actual delivery and the care gap were related significantly to patients' satisfaction with care (β = 0.17 and β = - 0.41, respectively).
conclusionsPatients' experiences with the actual level of PCC and the care gap are important for patients' satisfaction with care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.