Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30670102›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Effectiveness of a web-based screening and brief intervention with weekly text-message-initiated individualised prompts for reducing risky alcohol use among teenagers: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial within the ProHEAD consortium.

Silke Diestelkamp, Lutz Wartberg, Michael Kaess, Stephanie Bauer, Christine Rummel-Kluge, Katja Becker, Heike Eschenbeck, Hans-Joachim Salize, Markus Moessner, Christiane Baldus and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Technology-based interventions for alcohol prevention among children and adolescents].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Silke DiestelkampUniversity Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, German Center for Addiction Research in Childhood and Adolescence, Martinistr. 52, W29, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. s.diestelkamp@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6349-8059
Lutz WartbergUniversity Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, German Center for Addiction Research in Childhood and Adolescence, Martinistr. 52, W29, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Michael KaessClinic of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Centre of Psychosocial Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Blumenstraße 8, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stephanie BauerCentre for Psychotherapy Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Bergheimer Straße 54, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christine Rummel-KlugeClinic and Policlinic of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig, Semmelweisstraße 10, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Katja BeckerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University of Marburg, Hans-Sachs-Str. 6, 35039, Marburg, Germany.
Heike EschenbeckDepartment of Psychology, University of Education Schwäbisch Gmünd, Oberbettringer Str. 200, 73525, Schwäbisch Gmünd, Germany.
Hans-Joachim SalizeMental Health Services Research Group, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim /Heidelberg University, Germany, J5, 68159, Mannheim, Germany.
Markus MoessnerCentre for Psychotherapy Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Bergheimer Straße 54, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christiane BaldusUniversity Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, German Center for Addiction Research in Childhood and Adolescence, Martinistr. 52, W29, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Nicolas ArnaudUniversity Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, German Center for Addiction Research in Childhood and Adolescence, Martinistr. 52, W29, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Rainer ThomasiusUniversity Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, German Center for Addiction Research in Childhood and Adolescence, Martinistr. 52, W29, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
ProHEAD consortium

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GL1744D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly and excessive alcohol use is a significant threat to healthy development. Evidence supports the effectiveness of electronic alcohol interventions for young drinkers. However, effects are typically small and studies targeting under 18-year-olds are scarce. This trial is the first to evaluate the effectiveness of a single-session, brief, motivational, web-based intervention (ProWISE) plus weekly text-message-initiated individualised prompts (TIPs) in reducing alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harm among children and adolescents aged ≥ 12 years. TIPs are designed to decrease risky alcohol use by reaching youth in the contexts of their everyday lives and by providing individualised feedback on drinking intentions, actual drinking and succession in achieving personal goals for low-risk drinking or abstinence. METHODS/

designThe trial is part of the multicentre consortium ProHEAD testing e-interventions for mental health problems in children and adolescents. Participants in grades 6-13 aged ≥ 12 years will be recruited in schools which participate in ProHEAD (target N = 15,000). Main criterion for inclusion in the ProWISE-TIP trial is a positive screening for at-risk alcohol use in the CRAFFT-d questionnaire (target n = 1076). In a multicentre, four-arm, randomised controlled design the following groups will be compared: (A) web-based intervention plus TIPs for 12 weeks; (B) web-based intervention plus text-message-initiated assessment of alcohol consumption for 12 weeks; (C) web-based intervention only; and (D) alcohol-related psychoeducation. TIPs will be delivered shortly before and after high-risk situations for excessive alcohol use and will be tailored to age, gender, drinking motives and alcohol consumption. Study participants will be followed up at three, six and nine months in the ProWISE-TIP trial and at one and two years in the ProHEAD consortium. Primary outcome is alcohol use in the past 30 days at nine months after enrolment. Secondary outcomes are alcohol-related problems, co-occurring substance use, health service utilisation, mental health problems and quality of life. DISCUSSION: Trial results will generate important evidence on how to enhance effectiveness of single-session, web-based alcohol interventions for youth. The ProWISE-TIP intervention, if effective, can be used as a stand-alone alcohol intervention or as an add-on to school-based or community-based alcohol prevention programs.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00014606 Registered on 20 April 2018.

Indexed as

InternetRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk Reduction BehaviorText MessagingAdolescentAlcohol DrinkingChildData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient SelectionResearch DesignSample SizeAdolescenceBinge drinkingBoosterProHEADText-message interventionWeb-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID30670102
PMCPMC6341631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.