Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30670044›Full record

Trial reportBMC medicine2019

Clinical and economic outcomes of remotely delivered cognitive behaviour therapy versus treatment as usual for repeat unscheduled care users with severe health anxiety: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Richard Morriss, Shireen Patel, Sam Malins, Boliang Guo, Fred Higton, Marilyn James, Mengjun Wu, Paula Brown, Naomi Boycott, Catherine Kaylor-Hughes and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02298036 (Helping Urgent Care Users Cope With Distress About Physical Complaints), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02298036 nacompletednot on this map

Helping Urgent Care Users Cope With Distress About Physical Complaints: A Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2014 to 2017Enrolled156ConditionsFrequent Utilisers of Urgent Medical Care Who Have High Health AnxietyArms(Remote) Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Public and Patient Involvement and Engagement in Clinical Trials: A Multi-Perspective Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the ROWTATE Programme.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Richard MorrissDivision of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK. richard.morriss@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2910-4121
Shireen PatelDivision of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Sam MalinsDivision of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Boliang GuoDivision of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Fred HigtonDivision of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Marilyn JamesDivision of Rehabilitation and Ageing, University of Nottingham, School of Medicine, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Mengjun WuDivision of Rehabilitation and Ageing, University of Nottingham, School of Medicine, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Paula BrownNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Duncan MacMillan House, Porchester Road, Nottingham, NG3 6AA, UK.
Naomi BoycottNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Duncan MacMillan House, Porchester Road, Nottingham, NG3 6AA, UK.
Catherine Kaylor-HughesDivision of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Martin MorrisLeicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Plaza, Riverside House Bridge Park, Bridge Park Road, Thurmaston, Leicester, LE4 8PQ, UK.
Emma RowleyBusiness School, University of Nottingham, Wollaton Road, Nottingham, NG8 1BB, UK.
Jayne SimpsonNottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Duncan MacMillan House, Porchester Road, Nottingham, NG3 6AA, UK.
David SmartLeicester Terrace Health Centre, Adelaide St, Northampton, NN2 6AL, UK.
Michelle StubleyDivision of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
Joe KaiDivision of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, School of Medicine, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
Helen TyrerDepartment of Psychiatry, Imperial College, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is challenging to engage repeat users of unscheduled healthcare with severe health anxiety in psychological help and high service costs are incurred. We investigated whether clinical and economic outcomes were improved by offering remote cognitive behaviour therapy (RCBT) using videoconferencing or telephone compared to treatment as usual (TAU).

methodsA single-blind, parallel group, multicentre randomised controlled trial was undertaken in primary and general hospital care. Participants were aged ≥18 years with ≥2 unscheduled healthcare contacts within 12 months and scored >18 on the Health Anxiety Inventory. Randomisation to RCBT or TAU was stratified by site, with allocation conveyed to a trial administrator, research assessors masked to outcome. Data were collected at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The primary outcome was change in HAI score from baseline to six months on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary outcomes were generalised anxiety, depression, physical symptoms, function and overall health. Health economics analysis was conducted from a health service and societal perspective.

resultsOf the 524 patients who were referred and assessed for trial eligibility, 470 were eligible and 156 (33%) were recruited; 78 were randomised to TAU and 78 to RCBT. Compared to TAU, RCBT significantly reduced health anxiety at six months, maintained to 9 and 12 months (mean change difference HAI -2.81; 95% CI -5.11 to -0.50; P = 0.017). Generalised anxiety, depression and overall health was significantly improved at 12 months, but there was no significant change in physical symptoms or function. RCBT was strictly dominant with a net monetary benefit of £3,164 per participant at a willingness to pay threshold of £30,000. No treatment-related adverse events were reported in either group.

conclusionsRCBT may reduce health anxiety, general anxiety and depression and improve overall health, with considerable reductions in health and informal care costs in repeat users of unscheduled care with severe health anxiety who have previously been difficult to engage in psychological treatment. RCBT may be an easy-to-implement intervention to improve clinical outcome and save costs in one group of repeat users of unscheduled care.

trial registrationThe trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 19 Nov 2014 with reference number NCT02298036.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnxietyCognitive Behavioral TherapyCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSingle-Blind MethodTelemedicineTreatment OutcomeCognitive behaviour therapyDepressionDigitalFamily careHigh care costsHypochondriasisIllness anxiety disorderRemote therapyUrgent careVideoconferencing

Identifiers

PMID30670044
PMCPMC6343350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.