Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30670023›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2019

Evaluation of automated malaria diagnosis using the Sysmex XN-30 analyser in a clinical setting.

Evashin Pillay, Shanaz Khodaiji, Belinda C Bezuidenhout, Monwabisi Litshie, Thérèsa L Coetzer

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Microbiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rapid Detection ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Evashin PillayWits Research Institute for Malaria, Department of Molecular Medicine and Haematology, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand and National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa. evashinp@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0733-2860
Shanaz KhodaijiHematology Department, P. D. Hinduja National Hospital & Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India.
Belinda C BezuidenhoutWits Research Institute for Malaria, Department of Molecular Medicine and Haematology, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand and National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Monwabisi LitshieDepartment of Microbiology, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Thérèsa L CoetzerWits Research Institute for Malaria, Department of Molecular Medicine and Haematology, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand and National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa.
National Health Laboratory Service · ZAP. D. Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre · IN

Funding

Sysmex Malaria Study
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly and accurate diagnosis of malaria is a critical aspect of efforts to control the disease, and several diagnostic tools are available. Microscopic assessment of a peripheral blood smear enables direct visualization of parasites in infected red blood cells and is the clinical diagnostic gold standard. However, it is subjective and requires a high level of skill. Numerous indirect detection methods are in use, but are not ideal since surrogate markers of infection are measured. This study describes the first clinical performance evaluation of the automated Sysmex XN-30 analyser, which utilizes fluorescence flow cytometry to directly detect and quantitate parasite-infected red blood cells.

resultsResidual EDTA blood samples from suspected malaria cases referred for routine diagnosis were analysed on the XN-30. Parasitaemia was reported as a percentage, as well as absolute numbers of infected red blood cells, and scattergrams provided a visual image of the parasitized red blood cell clusters. The results reported by the XN-30 correlated with microscopy and the analyser demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity. Measurements were reproducible and storage of samples at room temperature did not affect the parameters. Several Plasmodium species were detected, including Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium ovale. The XN-30 also identified the transmissible gametocytes as a separate cluster on the scattergrams. Abnormal red blood cell indices (low haemoglobin and raised reticulocyte counts), haemoglobinopathies and thrombocytopenia did not interfere with the detection of parasites. The XN-30 also generated a concurrent full blood count for each sample.

conclusionsThe novel technology of the Sysmex XN-30 provides a robust, rapid, automated and accurate platform for diagnosing malaria in a clinical setting. The objective enumeration of red blood cells infected with Plasmodium species makes it suitable for global use and allows monitoring of the parasite load once therapy has been initiated, thereby providing an early marker of drug resistance. The automated generation of a full blood count for each sample provides an opportunity for detecting unsuspected cases. Asymptomatic carriers can also be identified, which will be useful in blood transfusion centres, and will enable treatment of these individuals to prevent the spread of the disease.

Indexed as

Automation, LaboratoryErythrocytesFlow CytometryHumansMalariaMalaria, FalciparumMalaria, VivaxParasitemiaPlasmodium falciparumPlasmodium ovalePlasmodium vivaxSensitivity and SpecificityAutomated diagnosisPlasmodium falciparumSysmex XN-30 analyser

Identifiers

PMID30670023
PMCPMC6341646
OpenAlexW2920358072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.