ArticleBMC family practice2019
A survey of the attitudes, beliefs and knowledge about medical cannabis among primary care providers.
Article in BMC family practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
86 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 172 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physicians' experiences, attitudes, and beliefs towards medical cannabis: a systematic literature review.BMC family practice · 2021Pooled it
- A Mapping Literature Review of Medical Cannabis Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Evidence in Approved Conditions in the USA from 2016 to 2019.Medical cannabis and cannabinoids · 2021Pooled it
- Knowledge, attitudes, and concerns about medical cannabis among U.S. healthcare professionals.Journal of cannabis research · 2026Article
- Development and Implementation of a Medical Cannabis Clinic Within a Geriatrics Primary Care Clinic: Preliminary Data.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Concerns, Beliefs and Attitudes of Pharmacists About Medical Cannabis Use in Poland.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinicians' attitudes and knowledge of medicinal cannabis in opioid dependence treatment clinics in New South Wales, Australia.Journal of cannabis research · 2025Article
- Cannabis: What We Use, Why It Matters, and When It Is Prescribed (Ethics, Policy, and Practice).Cureus · 2025Review
- Assessing the Market Readiness for Medical Cannabis in Greece: A Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Patient-provider interactions about cannabis for therapeutic purposes vary as a function of provider type: A pilot study.The American journal on addictions · 2025Article
- Role of the Endocannabinoid System in Fibromyalgia.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Evidence synthesis of medical cannabis research: current challenges and opportunities.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025Review
- Discussions of Cannabis Over Patient Portal Secure Messaging: Content Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Revealing the impact of social circumstances on the selection of cancer therapy through natural language processing of social work notes.JAMIA open · 2024Article
- "Like the Wild West": Health care provider perspectives on impacts of recreational cannabis legalization on patients and providers at a tertiary psychiatric hospital in Ontario, Canada.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2024Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and concerns about psilocybin and MDMA as novel therapies among U.S. healthcare professionals.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Application of mathematical models on efficiency evaluation and intervention of medical institutions in China.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Knowledge, opinions and experiences of nurses and nursing students in Portugal regarding the use of medical Cannabis.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- The attitudes, knowledge and confidence of healthcare professionals about cannabis-based products.Journal of cannabis research · 2024Article
- The Use of Compounds Derived fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- 'Why do we have to be the gatekeepers?' Australian general practitioners' knowledge, attitudes and prescribing intentions on e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation aid.BMC primary care · 2024Article
26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare providers play a critical role in facilitating patient access to medical cannabis. However, previous surveys suggest only a minority of providers believe that medical cannabis confers benefits to patients. Significant new knowledge about the potential benefits and harms of medical cannabis has recently emerged. Understanding current attitudes and beliefs of providers may provide insight into the ongoing challenges they face as states expand access to medical cannabis.
methodsWe conducted an electronic survey of primary care providers in a large Minnesota-based healthcare system between January 23 and February 5, 2018. We obtained information about provider characteristics, attitudes and beliefs about medical cannabis, provider comfort level in answering patient questions about medical cannabis, and whether providers were interested in receiving additional education.
resultsSixty-two providers completed the survey (response rate 31%; 62/199). Seventy-six percent of respondents were physicians and the average age was 46.3 years. A majority of providers believed ("strongly agree" or "somewhat agree") that medical cannabis was a legitimate medical therapy (58.1%) and 38.7% believed that providers should be offering to patients for managing medical conditions. A majority (> 50%) of providers believed that medical cannabis was helpful for treating the qualifying medical conditions of cancer, terminal illness, and intractable pain. A majority of providers did not know if medical cannabis was effective for managing nearly one-half of the other state designated qualifying medical conditions. Few believed that medical cannabis improved quality of life domains. Over one-third of providers believed that medical cannabis interacted with medical therapies. One-half of providers were not ready to or did not want to answer patient questions about medical cannabis, and the majority of providers wanted to learn more about it.
conclusionsHealthcare providers generally believe that medical cannabis is a legitimate medical therapy. Provider knowledge gaps about the effectiveness of medical cannabis for state designated qualifying conditions need to be addressed, and accurate information about the potential for drug interactions needs to be disseminated to address provider concerns. Clinical trial data about how medical cannabis improves patient quality of life domains is desperately needed as this information can impact clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.