Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30669975›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

Experimental validation of in silico predicted RAD locus frequencies using genomic resources and short read data from a model marine mammal.

David L J Vendrami, Jaume Forcada, Joseph I Hoffman

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David L J VendramiDepartment of Animal Behavior, University of Bielefeld, Postfach 100131, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany. david.vendrami@student.unife.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9409-4084
Jaume ForcadaBritish Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OET, UK.
Joseph I HoffmanDepartment of Animal Behavior, University of Bielefeld, Postfach 100131, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany.
Bielefeld University · DEBritish Antarctic Survey · GB

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft HO 5122/3-1European Union Marie Curie Seventh Framework Programme 605051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRestriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) has revolutionized the study of wild organisms by allowing cost-effective genotyping of thousands of loci. However, for species lacking reference genomes, it can be challenging to select the restriction enzyme that offers the best balance between the number of obtained RAD loci and depth of coverage, which is crucial for a successful outcome. To address this issue, PredRAD was recently developed, which uses probabilistic models to predict restriction site frequencies from a transcriptome assembly or other sequence resource based on either GC content or mono-, di- or trinucleotide composition. This program generates predictions that are broadly consistent with estimates of the true number of restriction sites obtained through in silico digestion of available reference genome assemblies. However, in practice the actual number of loci obtained could potentially differ as incomplete enzymatic digestion or patchy sequence coverage across the genome might lead to some loci not being represented in a RAD dataset, while erroneous assembly could potentially inflate the number of loci. To investigate this, we used genome and transcriptome assemblies together with RADseq data from the Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus gazella) to compare PredRAD predictions with empirical estimates of the number of loci obtained via in silico digestion and from de novo assemblies.

resultsPredRAD yielded consistently higher predicted numbers of restriction sites for the transcriptome assembly relative to the genome assembly. The trinucleotide and dinucleotide models also predicted higher frequencies than the mononucleotide or GC content models. Overall, the dinucleotide and trinucleotide models applied to the transcriptome and the genome assemblies respectively generated predictions that were closest to the number of restriction sites estimated by in silico digestion. Furthermore, the number of de novo assembled RAD loci mapping to restriction sites was similar to the expectation based on in silico digestion.

conclusionsOur study reveals generally high concordance between PredRAD predictions and empirical estimates of the number of RAD loci. This further supports the utility of PredRAD, while also suggesting that it may be feasible to sequence and assemble the majority of RAD loci present in an organism's genome.

Indexed as

AnimalsComputer SimulationDNA Restriction EnzymesFur SealsGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsModels, BiologicalModels, StatisticalRestriction MappingSequence Analysis, DNADNA Restriction EnzymesAntarctic fur sealPinnipedPredRADReference genomeRestriction enzymeRestriction site associated DNA sequencing (RADseq)Transcriptome assembly

Identifiers

PMID30669975
PMCPMC6341687
OpenAlexW2911497289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.