Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30669949›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2019

Patient-reported outcomes after a distal radius fracture in adults: a 3-4 years follow-up.

Roderick H van Leerdam, Floortje Huizing, Frank Termaat, Sanne Kleinveld, Steven J Rhemrev, Pieta Krijnen, Inger B Schipper

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Long-term clinical and socio-economic outcomes following wrist fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Systematic review of health utility losses from injuries and violence.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Assessment of Patients' Quality of Life during Conservative Treatment after Distal Radius Fracture.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Roderick H van Leerdama Department of Surgery , Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) , The Netherlands.
Floortje Huizinga Department of Surgery , Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) , The Netherlands.
Frank Termaata Department of Surgery , Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) , The Netherlands.
Sanne Kleinveldb Department of Surgery , Haga Hospital , The Netherlands ;
Steven J Rhemrevc Department of Surgery , The Hague Medical Center (HMC) , The Netherlands.
Pieta Krijnena Department of Surgery , Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) , The Netherlands.
Inger B Schippera Department of Surgery , Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) , The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLHaga Hospital · NLMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose - There are few reports on the outcome of distal radius fractures after 1 year. Therefore we investigated the long-term patient-reported functional outcome and health-related quality of life after a distal radius fracture in adults. Patients and methods - We reviewed 823 patients, treated either nonoperatively or operatively in 2012. After a mean follow-up of 3.8 years 285 patients (35%) completed the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and EuroQol-5D. Results - The mean PRWE score was 11. The mean EQ-5D index value was 0.88 and the mean EQ VAS for self-rated health status was 80. Nonoperatively treated type A and type B fractures had lower PRWE scores compared with operatively treated patients, whereas the EQ-5D was similar between groups. The EQ VAS for patients aged 65 and older was statistically significantly lower than that of younger patients. Interpretation - Patients had a good overall long-term functional outcome after a distal radius fracture. Patients with fractures that were possible to treat nonoperatively had less pain and better wrist function after long-term follow-up than patients who needed surgical fixation.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentFracture Fixation, InternalQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionWrist InjuriesAdultAgedBone PlatesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRadius Fractures

Identifiers

PMID30669949
PMCPMC6461106
OpenAlexW2912433349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.