ArticleBiosensors2019
A Novel Wearable Device for Continuous Ambulatory ECG Recording: Proof of Concept and Assessment of Signal Quality.
Article in Biosensors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence in the Heart of Medicine: A Systematic Approach to Transforming Arrhythmia Care with Intelligent Systems.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Cardiorespiratory Sensors and Their Implications for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Detection: A Systematic Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Pooled it
- A Survey on Wearable Sensors for Mental Health Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Pooled it
- Wearable Health Devices in Health Care: Narrative Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Pooled it
- Telemedicine in Pediatric Cardiology: Current Applications, Clinical Impact, and Future Perspectives.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Applications of Smart Textiles for Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Monitoring: Scoping Review of the Literature.JMIR cardio · 2026Article
- Biocompatible Electrospun Biomaterials for Advancing Thermoregulating Wearable Sensors in Next-Generation Smart Textiles.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Wearable devices in atrial fibrillation: screening, monitoring, and management.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- A portable dry-electrode ECG device for rapid and accurate neonatal heart rate monitoring during resuscitation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Wearable Devices for Arrhythmia Detection: Advancements and Clinical Implications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Wear Your Heart on Your Sleeve: Smart Textile ECG Wearables for Comfort, Integration, Signal Quality and Continuous Monitoring in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Recent Advancements in Acrylic Fabric Applications: A Comprehensive Review and Future Trends.Polymers · 2024Review
- Wearable ECG Device and Machine Learning for Heart Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comparison Between a Single-Lead ECG Garment Device and a Holter Monitor: A Signal Quality Assessment.Journal of medical systems · 2024Article
- Monitoring Adolescent and Young Adult Patients With Cancer via a Smart T-Shirt: Prospective, Single-Cohort, Mixed Methods Feasibility Study (OncoSmartShirt Study).JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Article
- Validation of a New and Straightforward Algorithm to Evaluate Signal Quality during ECG Monitoring with Wearable Devices Used in a Clinical Setting.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Wearable Technology for Monitoring Electrocardiograms (ECGs) in Adults: A Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Signal Quality Analysis for Long-Term ECG Monitoring Using a Health Patch in Cardiac Patients.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Progress in Data Acquisition of Wearable Sensors.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Feasibility of Monitoring Patients Who Have Cancer With a Smart T-shirt: Protocol for the OncoSmartShirt Study.JMIR research protocols · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnosis of arrhythmic disorders is challenging because of their short-lasting, intermittent character. Conventional technologies of noninvasive ambulatory rhythm monitoring are limited by modest sensitivity. We present a novel form of wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) sensors providing an alternative tool for long-term rhythm monitoring with the potential of increased sensitivity to detect intermittent or subclinical arrhythmia. The objective was to assess the signal quality and R-R coverage of a wearable ECG sensor system compared to a standard 3-lead Holter. In this phase-1 trial, healthy individuals underwent 24-h simultaneous rhythm monitoring using the OMsignal system together with a 3-lead Holter recording. The OMsignal system consists of a garment (bra or shirt) with integrated sensors recording a single-lead ECG and an acquisition module for data storage and processing. Head-to-head signal quality was assessed regarding adequate P-QRS-T distinction and was performed by three electrophysiologists blinded to the recording technology. The accuracy of signal coverage was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis. Fifteen individuals underwent simultaneous 24-h recording. Signal quality and accuracy of the OMgaments was equivalent to Holter-monitoring (84% vs 93% electrophysiologists rating,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.