Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30669602›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Improving Patient Access to New Drugs in South Korea: Evaluation of the National Drug Formulary System.

Seung-Lai Yoo, Dae-Jung Kim, Seung-Mi Lee, Won-Gu Kang, Sang-Yoon Kim, Jong Hyuk Lee, Dong-Churl Suh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. How Do Iranian Stakeholders Think About Pharmaceutical Managed Entry Agreements?Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2022
    Article
  12. The Primary Process and Key Concepts of Economic Evaluation in Healthcare.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Is Korean society prepared for the financial burden of novel anticancer drugs? A survey of willingness to pay among National Health Insurance beneficiaries.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. International Price Comparisons of Anticancer Drugs: A Scheme for Improving Patient Accessibility.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  19. Effect of Treatment with the PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors on Key Health Outcomes of Cancer Patients.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seung-Lai YooCollege of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea. firina@naver.com.
Dae-Jung KimCollege of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea. daejung@daiichisankyo.co.kr.
Seung-Mi LeeCollege of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea. hygeia77@hanmail.net.
Won-Gu KangCollege of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea. dol19@korea.kr.
Sang-Yoon KimCollege of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea. jumpingksy@naver.com.
Jong Hyuk LeeDepartment of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Hoseo University, Asan 31499, Korea. jhyuk@hoseo.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2304-8037
Dong-Churl SuhCollege of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea. dongsuh75@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study reviews and evaluates the national drug formulary system used to improve patient access to new drugs by making reimbursement decisions for new drugs as part of the South Korean national health insurance system. The national health insurance utilizes three methods for improving patient access to costly drugs: risk-sharing agreements, designation of essential drugs, and a waiver of cost-effectiveness analysis. Patients want reimbursement for new drugs to be processed quickly to improve their access to these drugs, whereas payers are careful about listing them given the associated financial burden and the uncertainty in cost-effectiveness. However, pharmaceutical companies are advocating for drug prices above certain thresholds to maintain global pricing strategies, cover the costs of drug development, and fund future investments into research and development. The South Korean government is expected to develop policies that will improve patient access to drugs with unmet needs for broadening health insurance coverage. Simultaneously, the designing of post-listing management methods is warranted for effectively managing the financial resources of the national health insurance system.

Indexed as

Drug CostsFormularies as TopicHealth Services AccessibilityCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansNational Health ProgramsRepublic of Koreacost-effectiveness analysisnational health insurancepatient accessreimbursementrisk-sharing agreement

Identifiers

PMID30669602
PMCPMC6352121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.