Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30669590›Full record

ArticleSports (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Inertial Sensors for Performance Analysis in Combat Sports: A Systematic Review.

Matthew To Worsey, Hugo G Espinosa, Jonathan B Shepherd, David V Thiel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Biomechanics and Sports Performances.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Limb biomechanics in combat sports: insights from wearable sensor technology.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew To WorseySchool of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia. matthew.worsey@griffithuni.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8499-545X
Hugo G EspinosaSchool of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia. h.espinosa@griffith.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-3974-6462
Jonathan B ShepherdSchool of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia. j.shepherd@griffith.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-2312-0497
David V ThielSchool of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia. d.thiel@griffith.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6052-9227

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of technology into training and competition sport settings is becoming more commonplace. Inertial sensors are one technology being used for performance monitoring. Within combat sports, there is an emerging trend to use this type of technology; however, the use and selection of this technology for combat sports has not been reviewed. To address this gap, a systematic literature review for combat sport athlete performance analysis was conducted. A total of 36 records were included for review, demonstrating that inertial measurements were predominately used for measuring strike quality. The methodology for both selecting and implementing technology appeared ad-hoc, with no guidelines for appropriately analysing the results. This review summarises a framework of best practice for selecting and implementing inertial sensor technology for evaluating combat sport performance. It is envisaged that this review will act as a guide for future research into applying technology to combat sport.

Indexed as

combat sportinertial sensorperformancetechnology

Identifiers

PMID30669590
PMCPMC6359075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.