Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30669521›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2019

Evaluation of the Effect of a Growing up Milk Lite vs. Cow's Milk on Diet Quality and Dietary Intakes in Early Childhood: The Growing up Milk Lite (GUMLi) Randomised Controlled Trial.

Amy L Lovell, Tania Milne, Yannan Jiang, Rachel X Chen, Cameron C Grant, Clare R Wall

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amy L LovellDiscipline of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. a.lovell@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-1708-9633
Tania MilneFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. t.milne@auckland.ac.nz.
Yannan JiangDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. y.jiang@auckland.ac.nz.
Rachel X ChenDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. rachel.chen@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0003-1689-1170
Cameron C GrantDepartment of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Grafton 1023, New Zealand. cc.grant@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-4032-7230
Clare R WallDiscipline of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. c.wall@auckland.ac.nz.

Funding

Danone N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

scores provide an alternative approach to measuring dietary quality. The Growing Up Milk-Lite (GUMLi) Trial was a multi-centre, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial of children randomised to receive a reduced protein GUM (GUMLi) or unfortified cow's milk (CM). In a secondary analysis of the GUMLi Trial, we used the Probability of Adequate Nutrient Intake (PANDiet) to determine the nutritional adequacy of the diets of participating children living in Auckland. The PANDiet was adapted to the New Zealand Nutrient Reference Values and data from four 24 h Recalls (24HR) collected at months 7, 8, 10, and 11 post-randomisation were used. Differences between randomised groups (GUMLi vs. CM) of the PANDiet and its components were made. Eighty-three Auckland participants were included in the study (GUMLi

Indexed as

Food, FortifiedMilkNutritional RequirementsNutritive ValueAnimalsDietDietary ProteinsDouble-Blind MethodEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansInfantInfant FormulaMaleMicronutrientsNew ZealandDietary ProteinsMicronutrientsdiet qualityearly childhoodgrowing up milknutrient intake qualitynutritional adequacyPANDiet index

Identifiers

PMID30669521
PMCPMC6356321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.