Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30669463›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

Evaluation of the Recipe Function in Popular Dietary Smartphone Applications, with Emphasize on Features Relevant for Nutrition Assessment in Large-Scale Studies.

Liangzi Zhang, Eline Nawijn, Hendriek Boshuizen, Marga Ocké

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liangzi ZhangNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands. liangzi.zhang@wur.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6231-5783
Eline NawijnDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands. eline_nawijn@hotmail.com.
Hendriek BoshuizenNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands. hendriek.boshuizen@wur.nl.
Marga OckéNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), 3721 MA Bilthoven, The Netherlands. marga.ocke@rivm.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1299-6135
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrient estimations from mixed dishes require detailed information collection and should account for nutrient loss during cooking. This study aims to make an inventory of recipe creating features in popular food diary apps from a research perspective and to evaluate their nutrient calculation. A total of 12 out of 57 screened popular dietary assessment apps included a recipe function and were scored based on a pre-defined criteria list. Energy and nutrient content of three recipes calculated by the apps were compared with a reference procedure, which takes nutrient retention due to cooking into account. The quality of the recipe function varies across selected apps with a mean score of 3.0 (out of 5). More relevant differences (larger than 5% of the Daily Reference Intake) between apps and the reference were observed in micronutrients (49%) than in energy and macronutrients (20%). The primary source of these differences lies in the variation in food composition databases underlying each app. Applying retention factors decreased the micronutrient contents from 0% for calcium in all recipes to more than 45% for vitamins B6, B12, and folate in one recipe. Overall, recipe features and their ability to capture true nutrient intake are limited in current apps.

Indexed as

DietMobile ApplicationsNutritive ValueSmartphoneCookingDatabases, FactualHumansMicronutrientsNutrientsNutrition AssessmentMicronutrientsNutrientsdiet appsdietary intake assessmentfood recordnutrient retentionrecipe calculationstechnological innovations

Identifiers

PMID30669463
PMCPMC6356331
OpenAlexW2910849801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.