Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30669406›Full record

ReviewCancers2019

A Review on a Deep Learning Perspective in Brain Cancer Classification.

Gopal S Tandel, Mainak Biswas, Omprakash G Kakde, Ashish Tiwari, Harman S Suri, Monica Turk, John R Laird, Christopher K Asare, Annabel A Ankrah, N N Khanna and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Gopal S TandelDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur 440012, India. gtandel@gmail.com.
Mainak BiswasDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Marathwada Institute of Technology, Aurangabad 431010, India. mainakmani@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0069-2978
Omprakash G KakdeIndian Institute of Information Technology, Nagpur 440012, India. ogkakde25@gmail.com.
Ashish TiwariDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, Nagpur 440012, India. atiwari.rcs@gmail.com.
Harman S SuriBrown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA. harman_suri@brown.edu.
Monica TurkDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Maribor, 2000Maribor, Slovenia. monika.turk84@gmail.com.
John R LairdDepartment of Cardiology, St. Helena Hospital, St. Helena, CA 94574, USA. lairdjr@ah.org.
Christopher K AsareDepartment of Neurosurgery, Greater Accra Regional Hospital, Ridge, Accra233, Ghana. drchristopher.asare@yahoo.com.
Annabel A AnkrahDepartment of Radiology, Greater Accra Regional Hospital, Ridge, Accra233, Ghana. aaankrah@yahoo.com.
N N KhannaDepartment of Cardiology, Apollo Hospitals, New Delhi 110076, India. drnnkhanna@gmail.com.
B K MadhusudhanNeuro and Epileptology, BGS Global Hospitals, Bangaluru 560060, India. drmadhubk@gmail.com.
Luca SabaDepartment of Radiology, A.O.U., Cagliari 09128, Italy. lucasaba@tiscali.it.
Jasjit S SuriStoke Monitoring and Diagnostic Division, AtheroPoint™, Roseville, CA 95661, USA. Jasjit.Suri@AtheroPoint.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A World Health Organization (WHO) Feb 2018 report has recently shown that mortality rate due to brain or central nervous system (CNS) cancer is the highest in the Asian continent. It is of critical importance that cancer be detected earlier so that many of these lives can be saved. Cancer grading is an important aspect for targeted therapy. As cancer diagnosis is highly invasive, time consuming and expensive, there is an immediate requirement to develop a non-invasive, cost-effective and efficient tools for brain cancer characterization and grade estimation. Brain scans using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), as well as other imaging modalities, are fast and safer methods for tumor detection. In this paper, we tried to summarize the pathophysiology of brain cancer, imaging modalities of brain cancer and automatic computer assisted methods for brain cancer characterization in a machine and deep learning paradigm. Another objective of this paper is to find the current issues in existing engineering methods and also project a future paradigm. Further, we have highlighted the relationship between brain cancer and other brain disorders like stroke, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Wilson's disease, leukoriaosis, and other neurological disorders in the context of machine learning and the deep learning paradigm.

Indexed as

braincancerdeep learningextreme learningimagingmachine learningneurological disorderspathophysiology

Identifiers

PMID30669406
PMCPMC6356431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.