Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30669177›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2019

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone in pregnant women.

Carla Biesdorf, Frederico S Martins, Sherwin K B Sy, Andrea Diniz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone in pregnant women.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carla BiesdorfDepartment of Pharmacy, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6879-6557
Frederico S MartinsSimcyp Limited (a Certara company), Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5555-8771
Sherwin K B SyDepartment of Statistics, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6405-9130
Andrea DinizDepartment of Pharmacy, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9638-9246
Universidade Estadual de Maringá · BRSimcyp (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPregnancy is associated with physiological changes that alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs. The aim of this study was to predict the PK of ziprasidone in pregnant women.

methodsA full physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of ziprasidone was developed and validated for the non-pregnant population (healthy adults, paediatrics, geriatrics), and this was extended to the pregnant state to assess the change in PK profile of ziprasidone throughout pregnancy.

resultsThe PBPK model successfully predicted the ziprasidone disposition in healthy adult volunteers, wherein the predicted and observed AUC, C

conclusionsThe PBPK model predicted the impact of physiological changes during pregnancy on PK and exposure of ziprasidone, suggesting that dose adjustment is not necessary in this special population.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalAdultAgedAge FactorsAntipsychotic AgentsArea Under CurveCaco-2 CellsChildDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Dosage CalculationsFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMental DisordersPiperazinesAntipsychotic AgentsPiperazinesThiazolesziprasidonePBPKpregnancyziprasidone

Identifiers

PMID30669177
PMCPMC6475689
OpenAlexW2913300948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.