Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30669003›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2019

Development and quantitative characterization of the precursor rheology of hyaluronic acid hydrogels for bioprinting.

Emi A Kiyotake, Alexander W Douglas, Emily E Thomas, Susan L Nimmo, Michael S Detamore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emi A KiyotakeStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA. Electronic address: emi.kiyotake@ou.edu.
Alexander W DouglasStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA. Electronic address: alexander.w.douglas@ou.edu.
Emily E ThomasStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA. Electronic address: Emily.E.Thomas-1@ou.edu.
Susan L NimmoChemistry and biochemistry University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA. Electronic address: Emily.E.Thomas-1@ou.edu.
Michael S DetamoreStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA. Electronic address: detamore@ou.edu.

Funding

RAD-X UP NARCH Supplement: A Cherokee Nation Community-Driven Program for Testing and Contact Tracing (Cherokee PROTECT)S06GM127983 · NIGMS · CHEROKEE NATION · PI KHAN, SOHAIL IMRAN · 2018 to 2022
$6.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS S06 GM127983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioprinting technologies have tremendous potential for advancing regenerative medicine due to the precise spatial control over depositing a printable biomaterial, or bioink. Despite the growing interest in bioprinting, the field is challenged with developing biomaterials for extrusion-based bioprinting. The paradigm of contemporary bioink studies relies on trial-and-error methods for discovering printable biomaterials, which has little practical use for others who endeavor to develop bioinks. There is pressing need to follow the precedent set by a few pioneering studies that have attempted to standardize bioink characterizations for determining the properties that define printability. Here, we developed a pentenoate-functionalized hyaluronic acid hydrogel (PHA) into a printable bioink and used three recommended, quantitative rheological assessments to characterize the printability: 1) yield stress, 2) viscosity, and 3) storage modulus recovery. The most important characteristic is the yield stress; we found a yield stress upper limit of ∼1000 Pa for PHA. Measuring the viscosity was advantageous for determining shear-thinning behavior, which aided in extruding highly viscous PHA through a nozzle. Post-printing recovery is required to maintain shape fidelity and we found storage modulus recoveries above ∼85% were sufficient for PHA. Two formulations had superior printability (i.e., 1.5 MDa PHA - 4 wt%, and 1 MDa PHA - 8 wt%), and increasing cell concentrations in PHA up to 9 × 10

Indexed as

BioprintingRheologyAnimalsCell SurvivalElastic ModulusHyaluronic AcidHydrogelsInkMesenchymal Stem CellsNeural Stem CellsRats, Sprague-DawleyViscosityHyaluronic AcidHydrogelsBioinksBioprintingHyaluronic acidHydrogelsRheology

Identifiers

PMID30669003
PMCPMC13286708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.