Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30668644›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2019

Neural Coding of Contact Events in Somatosensory Cortex.

Thierri Callier, Aneesha K Suresh, Sliman J Bensmaia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Stimulating localizable sensations.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical Applications and Future Translation of Somatosensory Neuroprostheses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Disentangling Temporal and Rate Codes in the Primate Somatosensory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thierri CallierCommittee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Aneesha K SureshCommittee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sliman J BensmaiaCommittee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Biomimetic Somatosensory Feedback through IntracorticalmicrostimulationR01NS095251 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BENSMAIA, SLIMAN, GRILL, WARREN M. · 2016 to 2020
$3.7M
Tactile Coding in Cuneate NucleusF31NS096952 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SURESH SAHU, ANEESHA · 2016 to 2018
$132k
NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS096952NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS095251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manual interactions with objects require precise and rapid feedback about contact events. These tactile signals are integrated with motor plans throughout the neuraxis to achieve dexterous object manipulation. To better understand the role of somatosensory cortex in interactions with objects, we measured, using chronically implanted arrays of electrodes, the responses of populations of somatosensory neurons to skin indentations designed to simulate the initiation, maintenance, and termination of contact with an object. First, we find that the responses of somatosensory neurons to contact onset and offset dwarf their responses to maintenance of contact. Second, we show that these responses rapidly and reliably encode features of the simulated contact events-their timing, location, and strength-and can account for the animals' performance in an amplitude discrimination task. Third, we demonstrate that the spatiotemporal dynamics of the population response in cortex mirror those of the population response in the nerves. We conclude that the responses of populations of somatosensory neurons are well suited to encode contact transients and are consistent with a role of somatosensory cortex in signaling transitions between task subgoals.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsDiscrimination, PsychologicalMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsPhysical StimulationSkin Physiological PhenomenaSomatosensory CortexTouchTouch Perceptionneural codingobject manipulationpopulation codingtactile fibertouch

Identifiers

PMID30668644
PMCPMC6917522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.