Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30668594›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

A public health approach to mobilizing community partners for injury prevention: A scoping review.

Alexander M Crizzle, Cathy Dykeman, Sarah Laberge, Ann MacLeod, Ellen Olsen-Lynch, France Brunet, Angela Andrews

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexander M CrizzleSchool of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5289-7257
Cathy DykemanHalton Region Health Department, Oakville, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah LabergeSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Ann MacLeodTrent Fleming School of Nursing, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.
Ellen Olsen-LynchTrent Fleming School of Nursing, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.
France BrunetEastern Ontario Health Unit, Cornwall, Ontario, Canada.
Angela AndrewsHaliburton, Kawartha, Pine Ridge District Health Unit, Port Hope, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesReducing injuries in adults requires work with diverse stakeholders across many sectors and at multiple levels. At the local level, public health professionals need to effectively bring together, facilitate, and support community partners to initiate evidence-based efforts. However, there has been no formal review of the literature to inform how these professionals can best create action among community partners to address injuries in adults. Thus, this scoping review aims to identify theories, models or frameworks that are applicable to a community-based approach to injury prevention.

methodsSearches of scientific and less formal literature identified 13,756 relevant items published in the English language between 2000 and 2016 in North America, Europe and Australia. After screening and review, 10 publications were included that (1) identified a theory, framework or model related to mobilizing partners; and (2) referred to community-based adult injury prevention.

resultsFindings show that use of theories, frameworks and models in community-based injury prevention programs is rare and often undocumented. One theory and various conceptual models and frameworks exist for mobilizing partners to jointly prevent injuries; however, there are few evaluations of the processes to create community action.

conclusionsSuccessful community-based injury prevention must build on what is already understood about creating partnership action. Evaluating local public health professional injury prevention practice based on available theories, models and frameworks will identify successes and challenges to inform process improvements. We propose a logic model to more specifically guide and evaluate how public health can work locally with community partners.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMalePublic HealthPublic Health PracticeWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID30668594
PMCPMC6342297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.