Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30668560›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2019

Asymmetric diversification of mating pheromones in fission yeast.

Taisuke Seike, Chikashi Shimoda, Hironori Niki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pheromone Response and Mating Behavior in Fission Yeast.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2022
    Review
  6. TheeLife · 2022
    Article
  7. Evolution and molecular bases of reproductive isolation.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Elevated Sporulation Efficiency in Fission YeastJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Taisuke SeikeGenetics Strains Research Center, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8738-7759
Chikashi ShimodaGraduate School of Science, Osaka City University, Sumiyoshi-ku, Osaka, Japan.
Hironori NikiGenetics Strains Research Center, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5391-6595
National Institute of Genetics · JPOsaka City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In fungi, mating between partners depends on the molecular recognition of two peptidyl mating pheromones by their respective receptors. The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Sp) has two mating types, Plus (P) and Minus (M). The mating pheromones P-factor and M-factor, secreted by P and M cells, are recognized by the receptors mating type auxiliary minus 2 (Mam2) and mating type auxiliary plus 3 (Map3), respectively. Our recent study demonstrated that a few mutations in both M-factor and Map3 can trigger reproductive isolation in S. pombe. Here, we explored the mechanism underlying reproductive isolation through genetic changes of pheromones/receptors in nature. We investigated the diversity of genes encoding the pheromones and their receptor in 150 wild S. pombe strains. Whereas the amino acid sequences of M-factor and Map3 were completely conserved, those of P-factor and Mam2 were very diverse. In addition, the P-factor gene contained varying numbers of tandem repeats of P-factor (4-8 repeats). By exploring the recognition specificity of pheromones between S. pombe and its close relative Schizosaccharomyces octosporus (So), we found that So-M-factor did not have an effect on S. pombe P cells, but So-P-factor had a partial effect on S. pombe M cells. Thus, recognition of M-factor seems to be stringent, whereas that of P-factor is relatively relaxed. We speculate that asymmetric diversification of the two pheromones might be facilitated by the distinctly different specificities of the two receptors. Our findings suggest that M-factor communication plays an important role in defining the species, whereas P-factor communication is able to undergo a certain degree of flexible adaptation-perhaps as a first step toward prezygotic isolation in S. pombe.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceATP-Binding Cassette TransportersDNA-Binding ProteinsGenes, FungalGenes, Mating Type, FungalHomeodomain ProteinsMeiosisMutationPeptidesPheromonesReceptors, PheromoneReproductionReproductive IsolationSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsTranscription FactorsATP-Binding Cassette TransportersDNA-Binding ProteinsHomeodomain Proteinsmam1 protein, S pombeMating Factor, S pombePeptidesP-factor, S pombePheromonesReceptors, PheromoneSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID30668560
PMCPMC6342294
OpenAlexW2952871848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.