Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30668305›Full record

ReviewTurkish journal of urology2019

Controversies in the management of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects.

Pankaj Mangalkumar Joshi, Vikram Batra, Sanjay B Kulkarni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Turkish journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Management of pelvic fracture urethral injury.Translational andrology and urology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Advances in urethroplasty.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. [Outcomes of partial pubectomy assisted anastomotic urethroplasty for male patients with pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Combined transperineal and transpubic urethroplasty for patients with complex male pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pankaj Mangalkumar JoshiKulkarni Reconstructive Urology Centre, Pune, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2233-7785
Vikram BatraKulkarni Reconstructive Urology Centre, Pune, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7503-6193
Sanjay B KulkarniKulkarni Reconstructive Urology Centre, Pune, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6942-4579

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic fracture associated urethral injury (PFUI) is a sequel of blunt pelvic trauma. The published rate of urethral injury varies from 5-25% in different series. Management includes options from primary realignment to delayed anastomotic urethroplasty. Anastomotic urethroplasty include an elaborated progressive perineal approach and combined transpubic approach. Though the treatment and approach is well accepted across the globe, controversies do exist. Through this section we would debate the literature regarding some controversial issues in management of PFUI. The aim of this article was to evaluate and elucidate upon the controversies that surround the PFUI repair in this era.The following controversial and pertinent issues with respect to the repair of such injuries were reviewed: Primary realignment versus delayed repair of PFUI, Necessity of inferior pubectomy, Predictability of inferior wedge pubectomy, Spatulation of distal bulbar and proximal urethral ends, Nomenclature of bulbar urethra. This study and evaluation comes from a tertiary high-volume center of reconstructive urology. Apart from our own center's experience the literature was reviewed for evidence synthesis and framing an opinion. Each of the above principles and surgical steps regarding management of pelvic fracture urethral injury was dealt with sequentially and evidence based literature reviewed. Only data from high volume urethroplasty centers and peer reviewed articles which made significant contribution were considered. The data was analyzed and conclusion drawn. On evidence collection there was sparse and scattered evidence in favour of early realignment even after technical advancement. Delayed anastomotic urethroplasty with progressive perineal approach is recommended. Inferior wedge pubectomy cannot be predicted based upon current conventional imaging.The injury and urethral distraction has a wide spectrum and with the fallibility of imaging, inferior pubectomy is a necessary steps under relevant settings to gain access to the posterior urethra. There are multitude of ways to spatulate urethra at either end although literature does not provide a superior way. Spatulation of distal urethra dorsally and leaving the proximal sphincter active urethra unspatulated is be the best scientifically. There is a need to reclassify the bulbar urethra to the penoscrotal junction to avoid under mobilization of bulbar urethra during the repair. There is no conclusive article addressing the controversial issues highlighted in this article. Adequate mobilization of bulbar urethra should be done till penoscrotal junction. Inferior pubectomy as a technique cannot be predicted and its utility cannot be underestimated. The spatulation of urethra can be done in multiple ways. Current anatomical definition of bulbar urethra is erroneous to imply urethra only in the bulb but with respect to surgery it should be extended till the penoscrotal junction.

Identifiers

PMID30668305
PMCPMC6342567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.