Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30668223›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2019

The cell-cycle transcriptional network generates and transmits a pulse of transcription once each cell cycle.

Chun-Yi Cho, Christina M Kelliher, Steven B Haase

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evolution of the Cell-Cycle Clock Models: Biochemical or Transcriptional?Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Using extremal events to characterize noisy time series.Journal of mathematical biology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chun-Yi Choa Department of Biology , Duke University , Durham , NC , USA.
Christina M Kellihera Department of Biology , Duke University , Durham , NC , USA.
Steven B Haasea Department of Biology , Duke University , Durham , NC , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple studies have suggested the critical roles of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) as well as a transcription factor (TF) network in generating the robust cell-cycle transcriptional program. However, the precise mechanisms by which these components function together in the gene regulatory network remain unclear. Here we show that the TF network can generate and transmit a "pulse" of transcription independently of CDK oscillations. The premature firing of the transcriptional pulse is prevented by early G1 inhibitors, including transcriptional corepressors and the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex APC

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksBiological ClocksCDC2 Protein KinaseCdh1 ProteinsCell CommunicationCell Cycle CheckpointsGene DeletionRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticUbiquitin-Protein Ligase ComplexesCDC2 Protein KinaseCdh1 ProteinsRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSTB1 protein, S cerevisiaeTranscription FactorsUbiquitin-Protein Ligase ComplexesWhi5 protein, S cerevisiaeanaphase-promoting complexcyclin-dependent kinaseTranscriptional networktranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID30668223
PMCPMC6422481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.