SynthesisGenetic testing and molecular biomarkers2019
β
Synthesis in Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of theERJ open research · 2025Article
- rs1801253 Gly/Gly carriage in the ADRB1 gene leads to unbalanced cardiac sympathetic modulation as assessed by spectral analysis of heart rate variability.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2024Article
- Association of Antihypertensive Drug-Related Gene Polymorphisms with Stroke in the Chinese Hypertensive Population.International journal of hypertension · 2024Article
- Beta-adrenergic receptors gene polymorphisms are associated with cardiac contractility and blood pressure variability.Physiological research · 2021Article
- Adrenergic receptors gene polymorphisms and autonomic nervous control of heart and vascular tone.Physiological research · 2021Review
- Functional network analysis reveals potential repurposing of β-blocker atenolol for pancreatic cancer therapy.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsβ-Adrenergic receptors (ADRBs) play a pivotal role in cardiovascular disease. Recently, genetic polymorphisms of ADRB1 and ADRB2 have been suggested to be associated with cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients, but the results of relevant studies are inconsistent and controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the association between ADRB1 and ADRB2 polymorphisms with cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in CAD patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases were searched for eligible studies published before April 2018. A total of 5495 patients from eight studies were included in our meta-analysis.
resultsWe found that CAD patients harboring the ADRB2 rs1042714 Glu27 allele exhibited a positive association with cardiovascular events (risk ratio [RR] = 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-1.58, p = 0.006), but not with all-cause mortality (RR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.70-1.35, p = 0.859), compared with patients who were Gln27 homozygotes. No other significant associations were observed between ADRB1 (rs1801252, rs1801253), ADRB2 (rs1042713, rs1800888) polymorphisms and cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality in CAD patients.
conclusionThis study suggests that the identified ADRB2 polymorphism could influence the outcomes of CAD patients, showing important clinical value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.