Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30667591›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacology in drug development2019

Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Extended-Release Tacrolimus Tablets Versus Twice-Daily Capsules in De Novo Liver Transplant.

Derek A DuBay, Lewis Teperman, Kimi Ueda, Andrew Silverman, William Chapman, Angel E Alsina, Carmelina Tyler, Daniel R Stevens

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacology in drug development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Early Conversion to Once-Daily MeltDoseJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Derek A DuBayMedical University of South Carolina, Department of Surgery, Charleston, SC, USA.
Lewis TepermanNorthwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Kimi UedaCalifornia Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Andrew SilvermanTampa General Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, Tampa, FL, USA.
William ChapmanWashington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, St Louis, MO, USA.
Angel E AlsinaTampa General Hospital, Division of Transplantation, Tampa, FL, USA.
Carmelina TylerVeloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
Daniel R StevensVeloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of once-daily extended-release tacrolimus tablets (LCPT) in de novo liver transplantation have not been previously reported. In this phase II, randomized, open-label study, de novo liver transplant recipients were randomized to LCPT 0.07-0.13 mg/kg/day (taken once daily; n = 29) or twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus capsules (IR-Tac) at 0.10-0.15 mg/kg/day (divided twice daily; n = 29). Subsequent doses of both drugs were adjusted to maintain tacrolimus trough concentrations of 5 to 20 ng/mL through day 90, and 5-15 ng/mL thereafter. Twenty-four-hour pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained on days 1, 7, and 14, with trough concentration and efficacy/safety monitoring through year 1. Similar proportions of patients in both groups achieved therapeutic trough concentrations on days 7 and 14 (day 7: LCPT = 78%, IR-Tac = 75%; day 14: LCPT = 86%, IR-Tac = 91%) as well as similar systemic and peak exposure. There was a robust correlation between drug concentration at time 0 and area under the concentration-time curve for both LCPT and IR-Tac (respectively, day 7: r = 0.86 and 0.79; day 14: r = 0.93 and 0.86; P < .0001 for all). Dose adjustments during days 1 to 14 were frequent. Thirty-five patients completed the extended-use period. No significant differences in adverse events were seen between groups. Incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (LCPT = 6 and IR-Tac = 4) was similar on day 360. Between formulations, overall exposure was similar at 1 week after transplant with the characteristic delayed-release pharmacokinetic profile of LCPT demonstrated in this novel population. These data support further investigation of the safety and efficacy of LCPT in de novo liver transplantation.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationArea Under CurveBiological AvailabilityCapsulesDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug Administration ScheduleDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleGraft RejectionHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMetabolic Clearance RateMiddle AgedTabletsTacrolimusCapsulesDelayed-Action PreparationsImmunosuppressive AgentsTabletsTacrolimusacute rejectioncalcineurin inhibitorimmunosuppressionphase IIsafety

Identifiers

PMID30667591
PMCPMC6899533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.