ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2019
Demyelinating lesions behaving like aggressive tumours on advanced MRI techniques.
Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Does arterial spin labelling represent a valid alternative to other MR perfusion techniques in neuro-oncology?La Radiologia medica · 2025Review
- Magnetic resonance spectroscopy for enhanced multiparametric MRI characterization of [EJNMMI research · 2025Article
- Tumour mimics in paediatric neuroimaging.Neuroradiology · 2025Review
- Challenges, limitations, and pitfalls of PET and advanced MRI in patients with brain tumors: A report of the PET/RANO group.Neuro-oncology · 2024Review
- Differential imaging of atypical demyelinating lesions of the central nervous system.La Radiologia medica · 2021Review
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Features of the Demyelinating Degeneration of White Matter in Young Patients.International journal of general medicine · 2021Article
- Clinical manifestations and imaging features of white matter demyelination in older patients.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumefactive demyelinating lesions are a rare disorder in which inflammatory demyelination manifests as solitary or multiple focal brain lesions (greater than 2 cm in size), which can be mistaken for glioma, lymphoma, metastasis and in some cases even brain abscess. The symptomatology of tumefactive demyelinating lesions depends on the white matter area involved and includes quickly progressing neurological deterioration of motor, sensory and visual function, praxis, language and mood impairment, as well as seizures. Recognising the key imaging features in a patient with a prior history of demyelination may expedite appropriate management. Preoperative diagnosis or at least the consideration of a demyelinating process is important to avoid unnecessary surgery. We report three patients with demyelinating lesions who presented with findings suggestive of demyelination on conventional magnetic resonance imaging studies. However, in all patients the lesions showed high perfusion and in two high permeability, which are findings generally seen with high-grade neoplasias. In rare instances, tumefactive demyelinating lesions may show increased perfusion and high permeability, imaging findings more commonly seen in high-grade gliomas. We suggest that if white matter lesions on conventional magnetic resonance imaging are compatible with tumefactive demyelinating lesions, atypical findings of high perfusion/permeability should not dissuade the radiologist from suggesting the presence of tumefactive demyelinating lesions rather than high-grade gliomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.