Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30667152›Full record

ReviewMolecular oncology2019

Cancer Prevention Europe.

Christopher P Wild, Carolina Espina, Linda Bauld, Bernardo Bonanni, Hermann Brenner, Karen Brown, Joakim Dillner, David Forman, Ellen Kampman, Mef Nilbert and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Effectiveness of exercise interventions in the management of cancer-related fatigue: a systematic review of systematic reviews.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Christopher P WildInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Carolina EspinaInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Linda BauldUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Bernardo BonanniEuropean Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy.
Hermann BrennerGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Karen BrownUK Therapeutic Cancer Prevention Network, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, UK.
Joakim DillnerKarolinska University Laboratory, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
David FormanInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Ellen KampmanDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
Mef NilbertDanish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karen SteindorfGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Hans StormDanish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Paolo VineisDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK.
Michael BaumannGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Joachim SchüzInternational Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRDanish Cancer Society · DKHeidelberg University · DEEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITGerman Cancer Research Center · DEImperial College London · GBKarolinska University Hospital · SEUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

Cancer Research UK 13101World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The case for cancer prevention in Europe is the same as for all other parts of the world. The number of cancers is increasing, driven by demographic change and evolution in the exposure to risk factors, while the cost of treating patients is likewise spiralling. Estimations suggest that around 40% of cancers in Europe could be prevented if current understanding of risk and protective factors was translated into effective primary prevention, with further reductions in cancer incidence and mortality by screening, other approaches to early detection, and potentially medical prevention. However, the infrastructure for cancer prevention tends to be fragmented between and within different countries in Europe. This lack of a coordinated approach recently led to the foundation of Cancer Prevention Europe (Forman et al., 2018), a collaborative network with the main aims of strengthening cancer prevention in Europe by increasing awareness of the needs, the associated required resources and reducing inequalities in access to cancer prevention across Europe. This article showcases the need for strengthening cancer prevention and introduces the objectives of Cancer Prevention Europe and its foreseen future role in reducing the European cancer burden.

Indexed as

Age FactorsEuropeGeographyHumansIncidenceNeoplasmscancerCancer Prevention EuropeEurope

Identifiers

PMID30667152
PMCPMC6396376
OpenAlexW2914280170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.