Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30666850›Full record

ArticleJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B

Oral administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG to newborn piglets augments gut barrier function in pre-weaning piglets.

Yang Wang, Li Gong, Yan-Ping Wu, Zhi-Wen Cui, Yong-Qiang Wang, Yi Huang, Xiao-Ping Zhang, Wei-Fen Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
  3. Early-life intervention withFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Research progress in isolation and identification of rumen probiotics.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A meta-analysis ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yang WangKey Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Key Laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, College of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Li GongKey Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Key Laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, College of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Yan-Ping WuKey Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Key Laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, College of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Zhi-Wen CuiKey Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Key Laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, College of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Yong-Qiang WangDepartment of Animal Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA.
Yi HuangKey Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Key Laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, College of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Xiao-Ping ZhangChina National Bamboo Research Center, Key Laboratory of High Efficient Processing of Bamboo of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310012, China.
Wei-Fen LiKey Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Key Laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, College of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103) on intestinal barrier function in pre-weaning piglets under normal conditions, twenty-four newborn littermate piglets were randomly divided into two groups. Piglets in the control group were orally administered with 2 mL 0.1 g/mL sterilized skim milk while the treatment group was administered the same volume of sterilized skim milk with the addition of viable L. rhamnosus at the 1st, 3rd, and 5th days after birth. The feeding trial was conducted for 25 d. Results showed that piglets in the L. rhamnosus group exhibited increased weaning weight and average daily weight gain, whereas diarrhea incidence was decreased. The bacterial abundance and composition of cecal contents, especially Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Fusobacteria, were altered by probiotic treatment. In addition, L. rhamnosus increased the jejunal permeability and promoted the immunologic barrier through regulating antimicrobial peptides, cytokines, and chemokines via Toll-like receptors. Our findings indicate that oral administration of L. rhamnosus GG to newborn piglets is beneficial for intestinal health of pre-weaning piglets by improving the biological, physical, and immunologic barriers of intestinal mucosa.

Indexed as

Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosusAdministration, OralAnimalsAnimals, NewbornCytokinesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeImmunity, InnateIntestinal MucosaMaleProbioticsSignal TransductionSwineWeaningCytokinesLactobacillus rhamnosus; Gut microbiota; Intestinal physical barrier; Intestinal immunological barrier; Piglet

Identifiers

PMID30666850
PMCPMC6381001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.