Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30666803›Full record

ReviewThoracic cancer2019

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of clinically node-negative non-small cell lung cancer.

Yusuke Takahashi, Shigeki Suzuki, Noriyuki Matsutani, Masafumi Kawamura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Thoracic cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The correlation between FDG-PET metabolic parameters, PD-L1 expression and p16/HPV status in oropharyngeal cancers.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yusuke TakahashiDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Sagamihara Kyodo Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2259-4896
Shigeki SuzukiDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Sagamihara Kyodo Hospital, Sagamihara, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8520-9393
Noriyuki MatsutaniDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masafumi KawamuraDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One in four non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are diagnosed at an early-stage. Following the results of the National Lung Screening Trial that demonstrated a survival benefit for low-dose computed tomography screening in high-risk patients, the incidence of early-stage NSCLC is expected to increase. Use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography during initial diagnosis of these early-stage lesions has been increasing. Traditionally, positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans have been utilized for mediastinal nodal staging and to rule out distant metastases in suspected early-stage NSCLC. In clinically node-negative NSCLC, the use of sublobar resection and selective lymph node dissection has been increasing as a therapeutic option. The higher rate of locoregional recurrences after limited resection and the significant incidence of occult lymph node metastases underscores the need to further stratify clinically node-negative NSCLC in order to select patients for limited resection versus lobectomy with complete mediastinal lymph node dissection. In this report, we review the published data, and discuss the significance and potential role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography evaluation for clinically node-negative NSCLC. Consequently, the literature review demonstrates that maximum standardized uptake value is a predictive factor for occult nodal metastasis with an accuracy of 55-77%. In addition, maximum standardized uptake value is a predictor for worse overall, as well as disease-free, survival.

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMaleMediastinumNeoplasm StagingPrognosisFluorodeoxyglucose F18Early-stagemediastinal nodal stagingoccult lymph node metastasisprognosisstandardized uptake value

Identifiers

PMID30666803
PMCPMC6397908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.