Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30666621›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2019

A sensitivity analysis approach for informative dropout using shared parameter models.

Li Su, Qiuju Li, Jessica K Barrett, Michael J Daniels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Li SuMRC Biostatistics Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-0919-3462
Qiuju LiMRC Biostatistics Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR, U.K.
Jessica K BarrettMRC Biostatistics Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR, U.K.
Michael J DanielsDepartment of Statistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611.

Funding

BAYESIAN APPROACHES FOR MISSINGNESS AND CAUSALITY IN CANCER AND BEHAVIOR STUDIESR01CA183854 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DANIELS, MICHAEL J · 2014 to 2019
$1.7M
British Heart Foundation RG/13/13/30194British Heart Foundation RG/18/13/33946Medical Research Council MC_U105261167Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/5Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/8Medical Research Council MR/L501566/1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA183854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shared parameter models (SPMs) are a useful approach to addressing bias from informative dropout in longitudinal studies. In SPMs it is typically assumed that the longitudinal outcome process and the dropout time are independent, given random effects and observed covariates. However, this conditional independence assumption is unverifiable. Currently, sensitivity analysis strategies for this unverifiable assumption of SPMs are underdeveloped. In principle, parameters that can and cannot be identified by the observed data should be clearly separated in sensitivity analyses, and sensitivity parameters should not influence the model fit to the observed data. For SPMs this is difficult because it is not clear how to separate the observed data likelihood from the distribution of the missing data given the observed data (i.e., 'extrapolation distribution'). In this article, we propose a new approach for transparent sensitivity analyses for informative dropout that separates the observed data likelihood and the extrapolation distribution, using a typical SPM as a working model for the complete data generating mechanism. For this model, the default extrapolation distribution is a skew-normal distribution (i.e., it is available in a closed form). We propose anchoring the sensitivity analysis on the default extrapolation distribution under the specified SPM and calibrate the sensitivity parameters using the observed data for subjects who drop out. The proposed approach is used to address informative dropout in the HIV Epidemiology Research Study.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalModels, StatisticalBiasHIV InfectionsHumansLongitudinal StudiesPatient DropoutsBayesian inferenceJoint modelslongitudinal datamissing datarandom effects

Identifiers

PMID30666621
PMCPMC6739227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.